Publications

BibTex format

@article{Kulasabanathan:2017:10.1186/s12992-017-0248-2,
author = {Kulasabanathan, K and Issa, H and Bhatti, Y and Prime, M and del, Castillo J and Darzi, A and Harris, M},
doi = {10.1186/s12992-017-0248-2},
journal = {Globalization and Health},
title = {Do international health partnerships contribute to reverse innovation? A mixed methods study of THET-supported partnerships in the UK},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0248-2},
volume = {13},
year = {2017}
}

Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BackgroundInternational health partnerships (IHPs) are changing, with an increased emphasis on mutual accountability and joint agenda setting for both the high- and the low- or middle-income country (LMIC) partners. There is now an important focus on the bi-directionality of learning however for the UK partners, this typically focuses on learning at the individual level, through personal and professional development. We sought to evaluate whether this learning also takes the shape of ‘Reverse Innovation’ –when an idea conceived in a low-income country is subsequently adopted in a higher-income country.MethodsThis mixed methods study used an initial scoping survey of all the UK-leads of the Tropical Health Education Trust (THET)-supported International Health Partnerships (n = 114) to ascertain the extent to which the IHPs are or have been vehicles for Reverse Innovation. The survey formed the sampling frame for further deep-dive interviews to focus on volunteers’ experiences and attitudes to learning from LMICs. Interviews of IHP leads (n = 12) were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Survey data was analysed descriptively. Interview transcripts were coded thematically, using an inductive approach.ResultsSurvey response rate was 27% (n = 34). The majority (70%) strongly agreed that supporting LMIC partners best described the mission of the partnership but only 13% of respondents strongly agreed that learning about new innovations and models was a primary mission of their partnership. Although more than half of respondents reported having observed innovative practice in the LMIC, only one IHP respondent indicated that this has led to Reverse Innovation. Interviews with a sample of survey respondents revealed themes primarily around how learning is conceptualised, but also a central power imbalance between the UK and LMIC partners. Paternalistic notions of knowledge could be traced to partnership p
AU  - Kulasabanathan,K
AU  - Issa,H
AU  - Bhatti,Y
AU  - Prime,M
AU  - del,Castillo J
AU  - Darzi,A
AU  - Harris,M
DO  - 10.1186/s12992-017-0248-2
PY  - 2017///
SN  - 1744-8603
TI  - Do international health partnerships contribute to reverse innovation? A mixed methods study of THET-supported partnerships in the UK
T2  - Globalization and Health
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0248-2
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/46181
VL  - 13
ER  -

Download

DrMatthewHarris

Contact

Location

Summary

Citation

BibTex format

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)