Imperial College London
Alternate

Dr Nikolas Mastellos

Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health

Honorary Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

n.mastellos Website

 
 
//

Location

 

Reynolds BuildingCharing Cross Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Rajani:2019:10.1186/s12889-019-7084-7,
author = {Rajani, NB and Weth, D and Mastellos, N and Filippidis, FT},
doi = {10.1186/s12889-019-7084-7},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
title = {Adherence of popular smoking cessation mobile applications to evidence-based guidelines.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7084-7},
volume = {19},
year = {2019}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BACKGROUND: Smoking remains one of the major preventable causes of chronic diseases. Considering the promising evidence on the effectiveness of mobile technology for health behaviour change, along with the increasing adoption of smartphones, this review aims to systematically assess the adherence of popular mobile apps for smoking cessation to evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: The United Kingdom Android and iOS markets were searched in February 2018 to identify smoking cessation apps. After screening, 125 Android and 15 iOS apps were tested independently by two reviewers for adherence to the National Institute of Care and Excellence (NICE) Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Self-Help Materials and the Five A Guidelines for Smoking Cessation. Pearson chi square tests were run to examine differences between the two operating systems. RESULTS: A majority of apps across both operating systems had low adherence (fulfils 1-2 out of 5 guidelines) to the Five A Guidelines (65.7%) and low adherence (fulfils 1-3 out of 9 guidelines) to the NICE Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Self-Help Materials (63.6%). Only 15% of mobile apps provided information about the benefits of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and even fewer provided information regarding types of NRT products (7.1%) or how to use them (2.1%). In addition, only a minority of apps arrange follow-up appointments or provide additional support to help smokers quit. CONCLUSION: Similar to previous mobile app reviews dating back to 2014, our findings show that most mobile apps do not follow existing smoking cessation treatment guidelines, indicating little change regarding the availability of evidence-based mobile apps for smoking cessation in the UK market. Smokers seeking to quit, tobacco control policy makers and software developers need to work together to develop apps that are in line with the latest clinical guidelines and strategies to maximise effectiveness.
AU  - Rajani,NB
AU  - Weth,D
AU  - Mastellos,N
AU  - Filippidis,FT
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-019-7084-7
PY  - 2019///
TI  - Adherence of popular smoking cessation mobile applications to evidence-based guidelines.
T2  - BMC Public Health
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7084-7
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196062
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/70905
VL  - 19
ER  -
Download