Imperial College London

DrPedroBallester

Faculty of EngineeringDepartment of Bioengineering

Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

p.ballester

 
 
//

Location

 

U401ABuilding E - Sir Michael UrenWhite City Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Publication Type
Year
to

91 results found

Loecher A, Bruyns-Haylett M, Ballester PJ, Borros S, Oliva Net al., 2023, A machine learning approach to predict cellular uptake of pBAE polyplexes., Biomater Sci, Vol: 11, Pages: 5797-5808

The delivery of genetic material (DNA and RNA) to cells can cure a wide range of diseases but is limited by the delivery efficiency of the carrier system. Poly β-amino esters (pBAEs) are promising polymer-based vectors that form polyplexes with negatively charged oligonucleotides, enabling cell membrane uptake and gene delivery. pBAE backbone polymer chemistry, as well as terminal oligopeptide modifications, define cellular uptake and transfection efficiency in a given cell line, along with nanoparticle size and polydispersity. Moreover, uptake and transfection efficiency of a given polyplex formulation also vary from cell type to cell type. Therefore, finding the optimal formulation leading to high uptake in a new cell line is dictated by trial and error, and requires time and resources. Machine learning (ML) is an ideal in silico screening tool to learn the non-linearities of complex data sets, like the one presented herein, with the aim of predicting cellular internalisation of pBAE polyplexes. A library of pBAE nanoparticles was fabricated and the uptake studied in 4 different cell lines, on which various ML models were successfully trained. The best performing models were found to be gradient-boosted trees and neural networks. The gradient-boosted trees model was then analysed using SHapley Additive exPlanations, to interpret the model and gain an understanding into the important features and their impact on the predicted outcome.

Journal article

Tran-Nguyen V-K, Ballester P, 2023, Beware of simple methods for structure-based virtual screening: the critical importance of broader comparisons, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol: 63, Pages: 1401-1405, ISSN: 1549-9596

We discuss how data unbiasing and simple methods such as protein-ligand Interaction FingerPrint (IFP) can overestimate virtual screening performance. We also show that IFP is strongly outperformed by target-specific machine-learning scoring functions, which were not considered in a recent report concluding that simple methods were better than machine-learning scoring functions at virtual screening.

Journal article

Ogunleye AZ, Piyawajanusorn C, Goncalves A, Ghislat G, Ballester PJet al., 2022, Interpretable Machine Learning Models to Predict the Resistance of Breast Cancer Patients to Doxorubicin from Their microRNA Profiles, ADVANCED SCIENCE, Vol: 9

Journal article

Ballester PJ, Stevens R, Haibe-Kains B, Huang RS, Aittokallio Tet al., 2022, Artificial intelligence for drug response prediction in disease models, BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, Vol: 23, ISSN: 1467-5463

Journal article

Hernández-Hernández S, Vishwakarma S, Ballester PJ, 2022, Conformal prediction of small-molecule drug resistance in cancer cell lines, Pages: 92-108

Drug design is a critical step in the drug discovery process, where promising drug molecules are engineered to be later evaluated preclinically and perhaps clinically. Phenotypic drug design has again gained traction. Cancer cell lines, a frequently adopted in vitro model for phenotype drug design, can be used to evaluate the drug resistance level (lack of inhibitory activity, for example) of a large number of molecules, and discard those that are the least likely to become drug candidates. By reusing these datasets, supervised learning models have been built to predict drug resistance on cancer cell lines. Usually, these methods have assigned reliability to the whole model rather than reliability to individual predictions (molecules). In problems such as drug design, accurately achieving the latter would revolutionize decision making. Conformal prediction is a model-agnostic method to assign reliability to each model prediction. In this study, we investigated the impact of conformal prediction on the prediction of inhibitory activity of molecules on a given cancer cell line. This analysis was carried out in each of the 60 cell lines from the NCI-60 panel to understand the variability of the results across cancer types. We also discussed the implications of predicting the molecules considered most potent. In addition, we investigated how the further subdivision of the training set to build conformal prediction models may affect the results obtained. Overall, we observed that those molecules deemed most reliable by conformal prediction are substantially better predicted than those that are not. This suggest that such computational tools are promising to guide phenotypic drug design.

Conference paper

Tran-Nguyen V-K, Simeon S, Junaid M, Ballester PJet al., 2022, Structure-based virtual screening for PDL1 dimerizers: Evaluating generic scoring functions, Current Research in Structural Biology, Vol: 4, Pages: 206-210

Journal article

Ghislat G, Rahman T, Ballester PJ, 2021, Recent progress on the prospective application of machine learning to structure-based virtual screening, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, Vol: 65, Pages: 28-34

Journal article

Simeon S, Ghislat G, Ballester P, 2021, Characterizing the Relationship Between the Chemical Structures of Drugs and their Activities on Primary Cultures of Pediatric Solid Tumors, Current Medicinal Chemistry, Vol: 28, Pages: 7830-7839

Journal article

Frasser CF, Benito CD, Skibinsky-Gitlin ES, Canals V, Font-Rosselló J, Roca M, Ballester PJ, Rosselló JLet al., 2021, Using Stochastic Computing for Virtual Screening Acceleration, Electronics, Vol: 10, Pages: 2981-2981

Journal article

Nguyen LC, Naulaerts S, Bruna A, Ghislat G, Ballester PJet al., 2021, Predicting Cancer Drug Response In Vivo by Learning an Optimal Feature Selection of Tumour Molecular Profiles, Biomedicines, Vol: 9, Pages: 1319-1319

Journal article

Piyawajanusorn C, Nguyen LC, Ghislat G, Ballester PJet al., 2021, A gentle introduction to understanding preclinical data for cancer pharmaco-omic modeling, Briefings in Bioinformatics

Journal article

Ballester PJ, Carmona J, 2021, Artificial intelligence for the next generation of precision oncology, npj Precision Oncology, Vol: 5

Journal article

Ghislat G, Cheema AS, Baudoin E, Verthuy C, Ballester PJ, Crozat K, Attaf N, Dong C, Milpied P, Malissen B, Auphan-Anezin N, Manh TPV, Dalod M, Lawrence Tet al., 2021, NF-$\upkappa$B–dependent IRF1 activation programs cDC1 dendritic cells to drive antitumor immunity, Science Immunology, Vol: 6, Pages: eabg3570-eabg3570

Journal article

Ghislat G, Cheema AS, Baudoin E, Verthuy C, Ballester P, Crozat K, Attaf N, Dong C, Milpied P, Malissen B, Auphan-Anezin N, Manh T-PV, Dalod M, Lawrence Tet al., 2020, An NF-$\upkappa$B/IRF1 axis programs cDC1s to drive anti-tumor immunity

Journal article

Ghislat G, Rahman T, Ballester PJ, 2020, Identification and Validation of Carbonic Anhydrase II as the First Target of the Anti-Inflammatory Drug Actarit, Biomolecules, Vol: 10, Pages: 1570-1570

Journal article

Ariey-Bonnet J, Carrasco K, Grand ML, Hoffer L, Betzi S, Feracci M, Tsvetkov P, Devred F, Collette Y, Morelli X, Ballester P, Pasquier Eet al., 2020, In silico molecular target prediction unveils mebendazole as a potent MAPK14 inhibitor, Molecular Oncology

Journal article

Ballester PJ, 2020, Selecting machine-learning scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening, Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Journal article

Ahmad S, Ballester PJ, Fernandez M, 2020, Editorial: Intelligent Systems for Genome Functional Annotations, Frontiers in Genetics, Vol: 11

Journal article

Naulaerts S, Menden MP, Ballester PJ, 2020, Concise Polygenic Models for Cancer-Specific Identification of Drug-Sensitive Tumors from Their Multi-Omics Profiles, Biomolecules, Vol: 10, Pages: 963-963

Journal article

Fresnais L, Ballester PJ, 2020, The impact of compound library size on the performance of scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening, Briefings in Bioinformatics, Vol: 22

Journal article

Li H, Sze K-H, Lu G, Ballester PJet al., 2020, Machine-learning scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening, WIREs Computational Molecular Science, Vol: 11

Journal article

Li H, Sze K-H, Lu G, Ballester PJet al., 2020, Machine-learning scoring functions for structure-based drug lead optimization, WIREs Computational Molecular Science, Vol: 10

Journal article

Ballester P, 2020, Stochastic-based Neural Network hardware acceleration for an efficient ligand-based virtual screening

Other

Sidorov P, Naulaerts S, Ariey-Bonnet J, Pasquier E, Ballester PJet al., 2019, Predicting Synergism of Cancer Drug Combinations Using NCI-ALMANAC Data, Frontiers in Chemistry, Vol: 7

Journal article

Menden MP, Wang D, Mason MJ, Szalai B, Bulusu KC, Guan Y, Yu T, Kang J, Jeon M, Wolfinger R, Nguyen T, Zaslavskiy M, Jang IS, Ghazoui Z, Ahsen ME, Vogel R, Neto EC, Norman T, Tang EKY, Garnett MJ, Di Veroli GY, Fawell S, Stolovitzky G, Guinney J, Dry JR, Saez-Rodriguez J, Abante J, Abecassis BS, Aben N, Aghamirzaie D, Aittokallio T, Akhtari FS, Al-lazikani B, Alam T, Allam A, Allen C, de Almeida MP, Altarawy D, Alves V, Amadoz A, Anchang B, Antolin AA, Ash JR, Romeo Aznar V, Ba-alawi W, Bagheri M, Bajic V, Ball G, Ballester PJ, Baptista D, Bare C, Bateson M, Bender A, Bertrand D, Wijayawardena B, Boroevich KA, Bosdriesz E, Bougouffa S, Bounova G, Brouwer T, Bryant B, Calaza M, Calderone A, Calza S, Capuzzi S, Carbonell-Caballero J, Carlin D, Carter H, Castagnoli L, Celebi R, Cesareni G, Chang H, Chen G, Chen H, Chen H, Cheng L, Chernomoretz A, Chicco D, Cho K-H, Cho S, Choi D, Choi J, Choi K, Choi M, De Cock M, Coker E, Cortes-Ciriano I, Cserzo M, Cubuk C, Curtis C, Van Daele D, Dang CC, Dijkstra T, Dopazo J, Draghici S, Drosou A, Dumontier M, Ehrhart F, Eid F-E, ElHefnawi M, Elmarakeby H, van Engelen B, Engin HB, de Esch I, Evelo C, Falcao AO, Farag S, Fernandez-Lozano C, Fisch K, Flobak A, Fornari C, Foroushani ABK, Fotso DC, Fourches D, Friend S, Frigessi A, Gao F, Gao X, Gerold JM, Gestraud P, Ghosh S, Gillberg J, Godoy-Lorite A, Godynyuk L, Godzik A, Goldenberg A, Gomez-Cabrero D, Gonen M, de Graaf C, Gray H, Grechkin M, Guimera R, Guney E, Haibe-Kains B, Han Y, Hase T, He D, He L, Heath LS, Hellton KH, Helmer-Citterich M, Hidalgo MR, Hidru D, Hill SM, Hochreiter S, Hong S, Hovig E, Hsueh Y-C, Hu Z, Huang JK, Huang RS, Hunyady L, Hwang J, Hwang TH, Hwang W, Hwang Y, Isayev O, Walk OBD, Jack J, Jahandideh S, Ji J, Jo Y, Kamola PJ, Kanev GK, Karacosta L, Karimi M, Kaski S, Kazanov M, Khamis AM, Khan SA, Kiani NA, Kim A, Kim J, Kim J, Kim K, Kim K, Kim S, Kim Y, Kim Y, Kirk PDW, Kitano H, Klambauer G, Knowles D, Ko M, Kohn-Luque A, Kooistra AJ, Kuenemann MA, Kuipeet al., 2019, Community assessment to advance computational prediction of cancer drug combinations in a pharmacogenomic screen, NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, Vol: 10, ISSN: 2041-1723

Journal article

Ballester PJ, 2019, Machine Learning for Molecular Modelling in Drug Design, Biomolecules, Vol: 9, Pages: 216-216

Journal article

Peón A, Li H, Ghislat G, Leung K-S, Wong M-H, Lu G, Ballester PJet al., 2019, MolTarPred: A web tool for comprehensive target prediction with reliability estimation, Chemical Biology &amp$\mathsemicolon$ Drug Design, Vol: 94, Pages: 1390-1401

Journal article

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://wlsprd.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-html.jsp Query String: respub-action=search.html&id=00347139&limit=30&person=true