Imperial College London

ProfessorPeterStafford

Faculty of EngineeringDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Professor of Engineering Seismology
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 7916p.stafford

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Ms Ruth Bello +44 (0)20 7594 6040

 
//

Location

 

321Skempton BuildingSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Edwards:2019:10.1007/s10518-018-0479-5,
author = {Edwards, B and Zurek, B and van, Dedem E and Stafford, PJ and Oates, S and van, Elk J and DeMartin, B and Bommer, J},
doi = {10.1007/s10518-018-0479-5},
journal = {Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering},
pages = {4441--4456},
title = {Simulations for the development of a ground motion model for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0479-5},
volume = {17},
year = {2019}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - We present simulations performed for the development of a ground motion model for induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field. The largest recorded event, with M3.5, occurred in 2012 and, more recently, a M3.4 event in 2018 led to recorded ground accelerations exceeding 0.1 g. As part of an extensive hazard and risk study, it has been necessary to predict ground motions for scenario earthquakes up to M7. In order to achieve this, while accounting for the unique local geology, a range of simulations have been performed using both stochastic and full-waveform finite-difference simulations. Due to frequency limitations and lack of empirical calibration of the latter approach, input simulations for the ground motion model used in the hazard and risk analyses have been performed with a finite-fault stochastic method. However, in parallel, extensive studies using the finite-difference simulations have guided inputs and modelling considerations for these simulations. Three approaches are used: (1) the finite-fault stochastic method, (2) elastic point- and (3) finite-source 3D finite-difference simulations. We present a summary of the methods and their synthesis, including both amplitudes and durations within the context of the hazard and risk model. A unique form of wave-propagation with strong lateral focusing and defocusing is evident in both peak amplitudes and durations. The results clearly demonstrate the need for a locally derived ground motion model and the potential for reduction in aleatory variability in moving toward a path-specific fully non-ergodic model.
AU - Edwards,B
AU - Zurek,B
AU - van,Dedem E
AU - Stafford,PJ
AU - Oates,S
AU - van,Elk J
AU - DeMartin,B
AU - Bommer,J
DO - 10.1007/s10518-018-0479-5
EP - 4456
PY - 2019///
SN - 1570-761X
SP - 4441
TI - Simulations for the development of a ground motion model for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands
T2 - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0479-5
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/74058
VL - 17
ER -