Imperial College London

ProfessorPallavShah

Faculty of MedicineNational Heart & Lung Institute

Professor of Respiratory Medicine
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7351 8021pallav.shah

 
 
//

Location

 

Fulham RoadRoyal Brompton Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Publication Type
Year
to

387 results found

Jeyin N, Desai SR, Padley SPG, Wechalekar K, Gregg S, Sousa T, Shah PL, Allinson JP, Hopkinson NS, Begum S, Jordan S, Kemp SV, Ridge CAet al., 2023, Dual-energy computed tomographic pulmonary angiography accurately estimates lobar perfusion before lung volume reduction for severe emphysema, Journal of Thoracic Imaging, Vol: 38, Pages: 104-112, ISSN: 0883-5993

PURPOSE: To assess if dual-energy computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (DECTPA) derived lobar iodine quantification can provide an accurate estimate of lobar perfusion in patients with severe emphysema, and offer an adjunct to single-photon emission CT perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT-PS) in assessing suitability for lung volume reduction (LVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with severe emphysema (forced expiratory volume in 1 s <49% predicted) undergoing evaluation for LVR between May 2018 and April 2020 imaged with both SPECT-PS and DECTPA were included in this retrospective study. DECTPA perfused blood volume maps were automatically segmented and lobar iodine mass was estimated and compared with lobar technetium (Tc99m) distribution acquired with SPECT-PS. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used for intermodality comparison between DECTPA and SPECT-PS. Univariate and adjusted multivariate linear regression were modelled to ascertain the effect sizes of possible confounders of disease severity, sex, age, and body mass index on the relationship between lobar iodine and Tc99m values. Effective radiation dose and adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS: In all, 123 patients (64.5±8.8 y, 71 men; mean predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s 32.1 ±12.7%,) were eligible for inclusion. There was a linear relationship between lobar perfusion values acquired using DECTPA and SPECT-PS with statistical significance (P<0.001). Lobar relative perfusion values acquired using DECTPA and SPECT-PS had a consistent relationship both by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias, -0.01, mean r2 0.64; P<0.0001). Individual lobar comparisons demonstrated moderate correlation (r=0.79, 0.78, 0.84, 0.78, 0.8 for the right upper, middle, lower, left upper, and lower lobes, respectively, P<0.0001). The relationship between lobar iodine and Tc99m values was not significantly altered after controlling for conf

Journal article

Buttery SC, Banya W, Bilancia R, Boyd E, Buckley J, Greening NJ, Housely K, Jordan S, Kemp SV, Kirk AJB, Latimer L, Lau K, Lawson R, Lewis A, Moxham J, Rathinam S, Steiner MC, Tenconi S, Waller D, Shah PL, Hopkinson NS, CELEB investigatorset al., 2023, Lung volume reduction surgery versus endobronchial valves: a randomised controlled trial., Eur Respir J

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBVs) can improve outcomes in appropriately selected patients with emphysema. However, no direct comparison data exist to inform clinical decision-making in people who appear suitable for both procedures. Our aim was to investigate whether LVRS produces superior health outcomes when compared to BLVR at 12 months. METHODS: this multi-centre, single-blind parallel-group trial randomised patients from five UK hospitals, who were suitable for a targeted lung volume reduction procedure, to either LVRS or BLVR, and compared outcomes at 1 year using the i-BODE score. This composite disease severity measure includes body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea and exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test). The researchers responsible for collecting outcomes were masked to treatment allocation. All outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. FINDINGS: 88 participants (48% female, mean (sd) age 64.6 (7.7), FEV1%predicted 31.0 (7.9) were recruited at five specialist centres across the UK and randomised to either LVRS (n=41) or BLVR (n=47). At 12 months follow up, the complete i-BODE was available in 49 participants (21 LVRS/28 BLVR). Neither improvement in the i-BODE score (LVRS: -1.10 (1.44), BLVR: -0.82 (1.61) p=0.54) nor in its individual components differed between groups. Both treatments produced similar improvements in gas trapping; RV% predicted (LVRS -36.1 (-54.1, -10), BLVR: -30.1 (-53.7, -9) p=0.81). There was one death in each treatment arm. INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not support the hypothesis that LVRS is a substantially superior treatment to BLVR in individuals who are suitable for both treatments.

Journal article

Hartman JE, Herth FJF, Shah P, Pison C, Valipour A, Slebos D-J, AIRFLOW-2 Study Groupet al., 2023, Computed tomographic airway morphology after targeted lung denervation treatment in COPD., Respir Med, Vol: 206

This post-hoc analysis of the AIRFLOW-2 trial investigated the changes in airway CT-parameters after targeted lung denervation (TLD) and whether these changes are associated with treatment response. In the treatment group (n = 32), an improvement in air trapping was significantly associated with an improvement in residual volume (RV). Furthermore, improvements in Pi10 and airway lumen were significantly associated with an improvement in both RV and FEV1. Our results could suggest that when improving airway characteristics like decreasing airway wall thickness and increasing the airway lumen, this leads to less air trapping and an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Journal article

Harrison J, Saccente-Kennedy B, Orton CM, McCarthy LP, Archer J, Symons HE, Szczepanska A, Watson NA, Browne WJ, Moseley B, Philip KEJ, Hull JH, Calder JD, Costello D, Shah PL, Epstein R, Reid JP, Bzdek BRet al., 2022, Emission rates, size distributions, and generation mechanism of oral respiratory droplets, AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ISSN: 0278-6826

Journal article

Shah PL, Orton CM, Grinsztejn B, Donaldson GC, Crabtree Ramírez B, Tonkin J, Santos BR, Cardoso SW, Ritchie AI, Conway F, Riberio MPD, Wiseman DJ, Tana A, Vijayakumar B, Caneja C, Leaper C, Mann B, Samson A, Bhavsar PK, Boffito M, Johnson MR, Pozniak A, Pelly M, PIONEER trial groupet al., 2022, Favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (PIONEER trial): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial of early intervention versus standard care., Lancet Respir Med

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has overwhelmed health services globally. Oral antiviral therapies are licensed worldwide, but indications and efficacy rates vary. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of oral favipiravir in adult patients who were newly admitted to hospital with proven or suspected COVID-19 across five sites in the UK (n=2), Brazil (n=2) and Mexico (n=1). Using a permuted block design, eligible and consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily for 1 day; 800 mg twice daily for 9 days) plus standard care, or standard care alone. All caregivers and patients were aware of allocation and those analysing data were aware of the treatment groups. The prespecified primary outcome was the time from randomisation to recovery, censored at 28 days, which was assessed using an intention-to-treat approach. Post-hoc analyses were used to assess the efficacy of favipiravir in patients aged younger than 60 years, and in patients aged 60 years and older. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04373733. FINDINGS: Between May 5, 2020 and May 26, 2021, we assessed 503 patients for eligibility, of whom 499 were randomly assigned to favipiravir and standard care (n=251) or standard care alone (n=248). There was no significant difference between those who received favipiravir and standard care, relative to those who received standard care alone in time to recovery in the overall study population (hazard ratio [HR] 1·06 [95% CI 0·89-1·27]; n=499; p=0·52). Post-hoc analyses showed a faster rate of recovery in patients younger than 60 years who received favipiravir and standard care versus those who had standard care alone (HR 1·35 [1·06-1·72]; n=247; p=0·01). 36 serious adverse events were observed in 27 (11%) of 251 pa

Journal article

Roodenburg SA, Barends CRM, Krenz G, Zeedijk EJ, Slebos D-Jet al., 2022, Safety and Considerations of the Anaesthetic Management during Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Treatments, RESPIRATION, Vol: 101, Pages: 697-705, ISSN: 0025-7931

Journal article

Conway F, Tonkin J, Valipour A, Pison C, Schumann C, Bonta P, Kessler R, Gesierich W, Darwiche K, Lamprecht B, Skowasch D, Johnson PJ, Slebos D-J, Shah PLet al., 2022, Crossover Patient Outcomes for Targeted Lung Denervation in Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: AIRFLOW-2, RESPIRATION, Vol: 101, Pages: 1069-1074, ISSN: 0025-7931

Journal article

Srikanthan K, Kistemaker L, Slebos D-J, Gesierich W, Darwiche K, Bonta P, Deslee G, Shah P, Gosens Ret al., 2022, Targeted lung denervation modulates the mucosal epithelial transcriptome in COPD, ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, Vol: 8

Journal article

Gamer JL, Shah PL, 2022, Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction To the Heart of the Matter, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, Vol: 206, Pages: 655-656, ISSN: 1073-449X

Journal article

Tonkin J, Shah PL, 2022, Sealing the gap in bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, RESPIROLOGY, Vol: 27, Pages: 1012-1014, ISSN: 1323-7799

Journal article

Orton CM, Tonkin J, Chan L, Conway F, Tana A, Vijayakumar B, Hartman JE, Caneja C, Avanzi L, Klooster K, Thornton J, Robertus JL, Slebos D, Bhavsar PK, Shah PLet al., 2022, Metered Cryospray improves patient-reported outcome measures at 6-months post-treatment, in patients with COPD with chronic bronchitis, in a randomised, sham-controlled trial, Publisher: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD, ISSN: 0903-1936

Conference paper

Buttery SC, Lewis A, Latimer L, Kemp SV, Shah PL, Waller D, Lau K, Jordan S, Greening NJ, Rathinam S, Banya W, Moxham J, Kirk AJB, Bilancia R, Tenconi S, Housley K, Lawson R, Steiner MC, Hopkinson NSet al., 2022, Comparative Effect of Lung volume reduction surgery for Emphysema and Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with valve placement: the CELEB trial, Publisher: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD, ISSN: 0903-1936

Conference paper

Tonkin J, Rogers A, Orton CM, Conway FM, Vijayakumar B, Chan L, Tana A, Caneja C, Avanzi L, Wawman R, Baikov A, Bhavsar PK, Shah PLet al., 2022, Relating ciliary dysfunction to clinical phenotypes in COPD, Publisher: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD, ISSN: 0903-1936

Conference paper

Zhang YZ, Sherlock S, Brambilla C, MacMahon S, Thompson L, Rice A, Robertus JL, Lim E, Begum S, Buderi S, Jordan S, Anikin V, Finch J, Asadi N, Beddow E, McDonald F, Antoniou G, Moffatt MF, Cookson WO, Shah PL, Devaraj A, Popat S, Nicholson AGet al., 2022, Adenocarcinoma Grade Correlates with PD-L1 and TP53, but not EGFR/KRAS Status and Diagnostic Yield: Analysis of 346 Cases, Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, Pages: S516-S517, ISSN: 1556-0864

Conference paper

Zhang YZ, Nicholson AG, Ly F, Rice A, Robertus JL, Lim E, Begum S, Buderi S, Anikin V, Finch J, Asadi N, Popat S, McDonald F, De Sousa P, Molyneaux PL, Moffatt MF, Cookson WO, Kemp S, Shah PL, Ridge CA, Desai S, Padley S, Devaraj A, Jordan S, Beddow E, Brambilla Cet al., 2022, Prediction of Clinically Significant Pathological Upstaging in Resected Lung Cancer: Insight from COVID-19 Pandemic (1st wave), Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, Pages: S112-S114, ISSN: 1556-0864

Conference paper

Saccente-Kennedy B, Archer J, Symons HE, Watson NA, Orton CM, Browne WJ, Harrison J, Calder JD, Shah PL, Costello D, Reid JP, Bzdek BR, Epstein Ret al., 2022, Quantification of Respirable Aerosol Particles from Speech and Language Therapy Exercises., J Voice

INTRODUCTION: Voice assessment and treatment involve the manipulation of all the subsystems of voice production, and may lead to production of respirable aerosol particles that pose a greater risk of potential viral transmission via inhalation of respirable pathogens (eg, SARS-CoV-2) than quiet breathing or conversational speech. OBJECTIVE: To characterise the production of respirable aerosol particles during a selection of voice assessment therapy tasks. METHODS: We recruited 23 healthy adult participants (12 males, 11 females), 11 of whom were speech-language pathologists specialising in voice disorders. We used an aerodynamic and an optical particle sizer to measure the number concentration and particle size distributions of respirable aerosols generated during a variety of voice assessment and therapy tasks. The measurements were carried out in a laminar flow operating theatre, with a near-zero background aerosol concentration, allowing us to quantify the number concentration and size distributions of respirable aerosol particles produced from assessment/therapy tasks studied. RESULTS: Aerosol number concentrations generated while performing assessment/therapy tasks were log-normally distributed among individuals with no significant differences between professionals (speech-language pathologists) and non-professionals or between males and females. Activities produced up to 32 times the aerosol number concentration of breathing and 24 times that of speech at 70-80 dBA. In terms of aerosol mass, activities produced up to 163 times the mass concentration of breathing and up to 36 times the mass concentration of speech. Voicing was a significant factor in aerosol production; aerosol number/mass concentrations generated during the voiced activities were 1.1-5 times higher than their unvoiced counterpart activities. Additionally, voiced activities produced bigger respirable aerosol particles than their unvoiced variants except the trills. Humming generated higher aero

Journal article

Mercer RM, Mishra E, Banka R, Corcoran JP, Daneshvar C, Panchal RK, Saba T, Caswell M, Johnstone S, Menzies D, Ahmer S, Shahidi M, Clive AO, Gautam M, Cox G, Orton C, Lyons J, Maddekar N, De Fonseka D, Prior K, Barnes S, Robinson G, Brown L, Munavvar M, Shah PL, Hallifax RJ, Blyth KG, Hedley E, Maskell NA, Gerry S, Miller RF, Rahman NM, Kemp SVet al., 2022, A randomised controlled trial of intrapleural balloon intercostal chest drains to prevent drain displacement, EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, Vol: 60, ISSN: 0903-1936

Journal article

Conway FM, Bloom CI, Shah PL, 2022, Susceptibility of patients with airways disease to SARS-CoV-2 infection., American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol: 206, Pages: 696-703, ISSN: 1073-449X

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a worldwide pandemic. People with airways disease are at higher risk of respiratory infection, and viruses can trigger respiratory exacerbations. Patients with airways disease may therefore be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, development of covid-19, or be at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Here we review susceptibility, based on current epidemiological studies, and explore biological mechanisms. Evidence from multiple large observational studies has shown chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant risk factor for covid-19 related mortality. Whether people with asthma are more susceptible to infection or severe outcomes has been much debated but appears to be related to their asthma phenotype and severity. To what extent these differences are biological or influenced by public health non-pharmacological interventions is difficult to quantify. Biological mechanisms that may influence susceptibility and adverse outcomes in airways disease include the increased expression of protein receptors enabling viral cell entry, dysfunctional epithelial airway immunity, type-2 inflammation and the use of inhaled corticosteroids. A better understanding of the susceptibility and mechanisms is essential for developing preventative and therapeutic strategies. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Journal article

Vijayakumar B, Tonkin J, Devaraj A, Philip KEJ, Orton CM, Desai SR, Shah PLet al., 2022, CT Lung Abnormalities after COVID-19 at 3 Months and 1 Year after Hospital Discharge, RADIOLOGY, Vol: 303, ISSN: 0033-8419

Journal article

Archer J, McCarthy LP, Symons HE, Watson NA, Orton CM, Browne WJ, Harrison J, Moseley B, Philip KEJ, Calder JD, Shah PL, Bzdek BR, Costello D, Reid JPet al., 2022, Comparing aerosol number and mass exhalation rates from children and adults during breathing, speaking and singing, Interface Focus, Vol: 12, Pages: 1-15, ISSN: 2042-8901

Aerosol particles of respirable size are exhaled when individuals breathe, speak and sing and can transmit respiratory pathogens between infected and susceptible individuals. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into focus the need to improve the quantification of the particle number and mass exhalation rates as one route to provide estimates of viral shedding and the potential risk of transmission of viruses. Most previous studies have reported the number and mass concentrations of aerosol particles in an exhaled plume. We provide a robust assessment of the absolute particle number and mass exhalation rates from measurements of minute ventilation using a non-invasive Vyntus Hans Rudolf mask kit with straps housing a rotating vane spirometer along with measurements of the exhaled particle number concentrations and size distributions. Specifically, we report comparisons of the number and mass exhalation rates for children (12–14 years old) and adults (19–72 years old) when breathing, speaking and singing, which indicate that child and adult cohorts generate similar amounts of aerosol when performing the same activity. Mass exhalation rates are typically 0.002–0.02 ng s−1 from breathing, 0.07–0.2 ng s−1 from speaking (at 70–80 dBA) and 0.1–0.7 ng s−1 from singing (at 70–80 dBA). The aerosol exhalation rate increases with increasing sound volume for both children and adults when both speaking and singing.

Journal article

Garner JL, Shah PL, 2022, Bronchoscopic approaches to sampling lung nodules: Aiming for the bulls eye, RESPIROLOGY, Vol: 27, Pages: 325-327, ISSN: 1323-7799

Journal article

Vijayakumar B, Boustani K, Ogger P, Papadaki A, Tonkin J, Orton C, Ghai P, Suveizdyte K, Hewitt R, Desai S, Devaraj A, Snelgrove R, Molyneaux P, Garner J, Peters J, Shah P, Lloyd C, Harker Jet al., 2022, Immuno-proteomic profiling reveals aberrant immune cell regulation in the airways of individuals with ongoing post-COVD-19 respiratory disease, Immunity, Vol: 55, Pages: 542-556.e5, ISSN: 1074-7613

Some patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19 suffer respiratory symptoms that persist for many months. We delineated the immune-proteomic landscape in the airway and peripheral blood of healthy controls and post-COVID-19 patients 3 to 6 months after hospital discharge. Post-COVID-19 patients showed abnormal airway (but not plasma) proteomes, with elevated concentration of proteins associated with apoptosis, tissue repair and epithelial injury versus healthy individuals. Increased numbers of cytotoxic lymphocytes were observed in individuals with greater airway dysfunction, while increased B cell numbers and altered monocyte subsets were associated with more widespread lung abnormalities. 1 year follow-up of some post-COVID-19 patients indicated that these abnormalities resolved over time. In summary, COVID-19 causes a prolonged change to the airway immune landscape in those with persistent lung disease, with evidence of cell death and tissue repair linked to ongoing activation of cytotoxic T cells.

Journal article

Wijsman PC, Goorsenberg AWM, Ravi A, d'Hooghe JNS, Dierdorp BS, Dekker T, Schaik CCLMV, Hacken NHTT, Shah PL, Weersink EJM, Bel EH, Annema JT, Lutter R, Bonta Pet al., 2022, Airway Inflammation Before and After Bronchial Thermoplasty in Severe Asthma, JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY, Vol: 15, Pages: 1783-1794, ISSN: 1178-6965

Journal article

Taton O, Heinen V, Bondue B, Slebos D-J, Shah PL, Carron K, Moens O, Leduc Det al., 2022, Long-Term Follow-Up of Intralobar Bullae After Endobronchial Valve Treatment for Emphysema, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, Vol: 17, Pages: 1735-1742, ISSN: 1178-2005

Journal article

Garner JL, Shah PL, 2022, Endobronchial treatment of severe asthma and severe emphysema with hyperinflation., Curr Opin Pulm Med, Vol: 28, Pages: 52-61

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of interventional pulmonology has ushered in a wave of innovations for individuals with obstructive airways disease in whom established medical therapies have failed. Leading the charge are bronchial thermoplasty for severe refractory asthma and uni-directional valves for severe emphysema with hyperinflation: both have received regulatory approvals in the United Kingdom and United States. With the commissioning of these novel treatments comes new challenges relating to implementation, positioning within therapeutic algorithms, honing of patient selection, and establishing long-term safety and benefits beyond 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: This review summarises the evidence for their safety and efficacy, predictors of therapeutic response, mechanism(s) of action and emerging data supporting the durability of outcomes out to at least ten years. SUMMARY: It is anticipated the experience of treating increasing numbers of patients, the adoption of international registries, and ongoing research evaluations will serve to optimise these therapies for future generations of patients.

Journal article

Orton CM, Symons HE, Moseley B, Archer J, Watson NA, Philip KEJ, Sheikh S, Saccente-Kennedy B, Costello D, Browne WJ, Calder JD, Bzdek BR, Hull JH, Reid JP, Shah PLet al., 2022, A comparison of respiratory particle emission rates at rest and while speaking or exercising., Commun Med (Lond), Vol: 2

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the prohibition of group-based exercise and the cancellation of sporting events. Evaluation of respiratory aerosol emissions is necessary to quantify exercise-related transmission risk and inform mitigation strategies. METHODS: Aerosol mass emission rates are calculated from concurrent aerosol and ventilation data, enabling absolute comparison. An aerodynamic particle sizer (0.54-20 μm diameter) samples exhalate from within a cardiopulmonary exercise testing mask, at rest, while speaking and during cycle ergometer-based exercise. Exercise challenge testing is performed to replicate typical gym-based exercise and very vigorous exercise, as determined by a preceding maximally exhaustive exercise test. RESULTS: We present data from 25 healthy participants (13 males, 12 females; 36.4 years). The size of aerosol particles generated at rest and during exercise is similar (unimodal ~0.57-0.71 µm), whereas vocalization also generated aerosol particles of larger size (i.e. was bimodal ~0.69 and ~1.74 µm). The aerosol mass emission rate during speaking (0.092 ng s-1; minute ventilation (VE) 15.1 L min-1) and vigorous exercise (0.207 ng s-1, p = 0.726; VE 62.6 L min-1) is similar, but lower than during very vigorous exercise (0.682 ng s-1, p < 0.001; VE 113.6 L min-1). CONCLUSIONS: Vocalisation drives greater aerosol mass emission rates, compared to breathing at rest. Aerosol mass emission rates in exercise rise with intensity. Aerosol mass emission rates during vigorous exercise are no different from speaking at a conversational level. Mitigation strategies for airborne pathogens for non-exercise-based social interactions incorporating vocalisation, may be suitable for the majority of exercise settings. However, the use of facemasks when exercising may be less ef

Journal article

Koegelenberg CFN, van Zyl-Smit RN, Dheda K, Allwood BW, Vorster MJ, Plekker D, Slebos D-J, Klooster K, Shah PL, Herth FJF, Assembly on Interventional Pulmonology of the South African Thoracic Societyet al., 2022, Position statement on endoscopic lung volume reduction in South Africa: 2022 update., Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med, Vol: 28

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in South Africa. Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) was first proposed by the South African Thoracic Society (SATS) for the treatment of advanced emphysema in 2015. Since the original statement was published, there has been a growing body of evidence that a certain well-defined sub-group of patients with advanced emphysema may benefit from ELVR, to the point where the current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Guidelines and the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advocate the use of endoscopic valves based on level A evidence. Patients aged 40 - 75 years with severe dyspnoea (COPD Assessment Test score ≥10) despite maximal medical therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation, with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 20 - 50%, hyperinflation with residual volume (RV) >175% or RV/total lung capacity (TLC) >55% and a six-minute walking distance (6MWD) of 100 - 450 m (post-rehabilitation) should be referred for evaluation for ELVR, provided no contraindications (e.g. severe pulmonary hypertension) are present. Further evaluation should focus on the extent of parenchymal tissue destruction on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the lungs and interlobar collateral ventilation (CV) to identify a potential target lobe. Commercially available radiology software packages and/or an endobronchial catheter system can aid in this assessment. The aim of this statement is to provide the South African medical practitioner and healthcare funders with an overview of the practical aspects and current evidence for the judicious use of the valves and other ELVR modalities which may become available in the country.

Journal article

Ravi A, Goorsenberg AWM, Dijkhuis A, Dierdorp BS, Dekker T, van Weeghel M, Sabogal YS, Shah PL, ten Hacken NHT, Annema JT, Sterk PJ, Vaz FM, Bonta PI, Lutter Ret al., 2021, Metabolic differences between bronchial epithelium from healthy individuals and patients with asthma and the effect of bronchial thermoplasty, JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, Vol: 148, Pages: 1236-1248, ISSN: 0091-6749

Journal article

Orton CM, Symons HE, Moseley B, Archer J, Watson NA, Philip KEJ, Saccente-Kennedy B, Costello DAE, Browne WJ, Calder JD, Bzdek BR, Hull JH, Reid JP, Shah PLet al., 2021, RESPIRATORY PARTICLE AND DROPLET EMISSION DURING SPEECH AND EXERCISE, Publisher: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, Pages: A3-A4, ISSN: 0040-6376

Conference paper

Evans RA, McAuley H, Harrison EM, Shikotra A, Singapuri A, Sereno M, Elneima O, Docherty AB, Lone NI, Leavy OC, Daines L, Baillie JK, Brown JS, Chalder T, De Soyza A, Diar Bakerly N, Easom N, Geddes JR, Greening NJ, Hart N, Heaney LG, Heller S, Howard L, Hurst JR, Jacob J, Jenkins RG, Jolley C, Kerr S, Kon OM, Lewis K, Lord JM, McCann GP, Neubauer S, Openshaw PJM, Parekh D, Pfeffer P, Rahman NM, Raman B, Richardson M, Rowland M, Semple MG, Shah AM, Singh SJ, Sheikh A, Thomas D, Toshner M, Chalmers JD, Ho L-P, Horsley A, Marks M, Poinasamy K, Wain LV, Brightling CE, PHOSP-COVID Collaborative Groupet al., 2021, Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Vol: 9, Pages: 1275-1287, ISSN: 2213-2600

BACKGROUND: The impact of COVID-19 on physical and mental health and employment after hospitalisation with acute disease is not well understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of COVID-19-related hospitalisation on health and employment, to identify factors associated with recovery, and to describe recovery phenotypes. METHODS: The Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) is a multicentre, long-term follow-up study of adults (aged ≥18 years) discharged from hospital in the UK with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, involving an assessment between 2 and 7 months after discharge, including detailed recording of symptoms, and physiological and biochemical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was done for the primary outcome of patient-perceived recovery, with age, sex, ethnicity, body-mass index, comorbidities, and severity of acute illness as covariates. A post-hoc cluster analysis of outcomes for breathlessness, fatigue, mental health, cognitive impairment, and physical performance was done using the clustering large applications k-medoids approach. The study is registered on the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN10980107). FINDINGS: We report findings for 1077 patients discharged from hospital between March 5 and Nov 30, 2020, who underwent assessment at a median of 5·9 months (IQR 4·9-6·5) after discharge. Participants had a mean age of 58 years (SD 13); 384 (36%) were female, 710 (69%) were of white ethnicity, 288 (27%) had received mechanical ventilation, and 540 (50%) had at least two comorbidities. At follow-up, only 239 (29%) of 830 participants felt fully recovered, 158 (20%) of 806 had a new disability (assessed by the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning), and 124 (19%) of 641 experienced a health-related change in occupation. Factors associated with not recovering were female sex, middle age (40-59 years), two or more comorbidities, and more severe acute illness. The magnitude of the persistent health bur

Journal article

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://wlsprd.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-html.jsp Query String: respub-action=search.html&id=00173417&limit=30&person=true