Imperial College London

Polina Levontin

Faculty of Natural SciencesCentre for Environmental Policy

Advanced Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

polina.levontin02

 
 
//

Location

 

Weeks BuildingSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Rindorf:2017:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012,
author = {Rindorf, A and Mumford, J and Baranowski, P and Clausen, LW and Garcia, D and Hintzen, NT and Kempf, A and Leach, A and Levontin, P and Mace, P and Mackinson, S and Maravelias, C and Prellezo, R and Quetglas, A and Tserpes, G and Voss, R and Reid, D},
doi = {10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012},
journal = {Marine Policy},
pages = {33--41},
title = {Moving beyond the MSY concept to reflect multidimensional fisheries management objectives},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012},
volume = {85},
year = {2017}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Maximising the long term average catch of single stock fisheries as prescribed by the globally-legislated MSY objective is unlikely to ensure ecosystem, economic, social and governance sustainability unless an effort is made to explicitly include these considerations. We investigated how objectives to be maximised can be combined with sustainability constraints aiming specifically at one or more of these four sustainability pillars. The study was conducted as a three-year interactive process involving 290 participating science, industry, NGO and management representatives from six different European regions. Economic considerations and inclusive governance were generally preferred as the key objectives to be maximised in complex fisheries, recognising that ecosystem, social and governance constraints are also key aspects of sustainability in all regions. Relative preferences differed between regions and cases but were similar across a series of workshops, different levels of information provided and the form of elicitation methods used as long as major shifts in context or stakeholder composition did not occur. Maximising inclusiveness in governance, particularly the inclusiveness of affected stakeholders, was highly preferred by participants across the project. This suggests that advice incorporating flexibility in the interpretation of objectives to leave room for meaningful inclusiveness in decision-making processes is likely to be a prerequisite for stakeholder buy-in to management decisions.
AU - Rindorf,A
AU - Mumford,J
AU - Baranowski,P
AU - Clausen,LW
AU - Garcia,D
AU - Hintzen,NT
AU - Kempf,A
AU - Leach,A
AU - Levontin,P
AU - Mace,P
AU - Mackinson,S
AU - Maravelias,C
AU - Prellezo,R
AU - Quetglas,A
AU - Tserpes,G
AU - Voss,R
AU - Reid,D
DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012
EP - 41
PY - 2017///
SN - 0308-597X
SP - 33
TI - Moving beyond the MSY concept to reflect multidimensional fisheries management objectives
T2 - Marine Policy
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012
UR - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000413385400005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55825
VL - 85
ER -