Imperial College London

Dr Ranil De Silva

Faculty of MedicineNational Heart & Lung Institute

Clinical Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7351 8626r.desilva Website

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Ms Deborah Curcher +44 (0)20 7351 8626

 
//

Location

 

Chelsea WingSydney StreetRoyal Brompton Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Jones:2018:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.274,
author = {Jones, DA and Rathod, KS and Koganti, S and Hamshere, S and Astroulakis, Z and Lim, P and Sirker, A and O'Mahony, C and Jain, AK and Knight, CJ and Dalby, MC and Malik, IS and Mathur, A and Rakhit, R and Lockie, T and Redwood, S and MacCarthy, PA and Desilva, R and Weerackody, R and Wragg, A and Smith, EJ and Bourantas, CV},
doi = {10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.274},
journal = {JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions},
pages = {1313--1321},
title = {Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes from the pan-London PCI cohort},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.274},
volume = {11},
year = {2018}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the effect on long-term survival of using optical coherence tomography (OCT) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Angiographic guidance for PCI has substantial limitations. The superior spatial resolution of OCT could translate into meaningful clinical benefits, although limited data exist to date about their effect on clinical endpoints. METHODS: This was a cohort study based on the Pan-London (United Kingdom) PCI registry, which includes 123,764 patients who underwent PCI in National Health Service hospitals in London between 2005 and 2015. Patients undergoing primary PCI or pressure wire use were excluded leaving 87,166 patients in the study. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at a median of 4.8 years. RESULTS: OCT was used in 1,149 (1.3%) patients, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used in 10,971 (12.6%) patients, and angiography alone in the remaining 75,046 patients. Overall OCT rates increased over time (p < 0.0001), with variation in rates between centers (p = 0.002). The mean stent length was shortest in the angiography-guided group, longer in the IVUS-guided group, and longest in the OCT-guided group. OCT-guided procedures were associated with greater procedural success rates and reduced in-hospital MACE rates. A significant difference in mortality was observed between patients who underwent OCT-guided PCI (7.7%) compared with patients who underwent either IVUS-guided (12.2%) or angiography-guided (15.7%; p < 0.0001) PCI, with differences seen for both elective (p < 0.0001) and acute coronary syndrome subgroups (p = 0.0024). Overall this difference persisted after multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.81; p = 0.001) and propensity matching (hazard ratio: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.77; p = 0.0008; OCT vs. angiography-alone cohort), with no difference in matched OCT and IVUS cohorts
AU - Jones,DA
AU - Rathod,KS
AU - Koganti,S
AU - Hamshere,S
AU - Astroulakis,Z
AU - Lim,P
AU - Sirker,A
AU - O'Mahony,C
AU - Jain,AK
AU - Knight,CJ
AU - Dalby,MC
AU - Malik,IS
AU - Mathur,A
AU - Rakhit,R
AU - Lockie,T
AU - Redwood,S
AU - MacCarthy,PA
AU - Desilva,R
AU - Weerackody,R
AU - Wragg,A
AU - Smith,EJ
AU - Bourantas,CV
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.274
EP - 1321
PY - 2018///
SN - 1936-8798
SP - 1313
TI - Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes from the pan-London PCI cohort
T2 - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.274
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30025725
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/61378
VL - 11
ER -