Imperial College London

Dr. Rebekah E. T. Moore

Faculty of EngineeringDepartment of Earth Science & Engineering

Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

r.moore13 Website

 
 
//

Location

 

4.40/20Royal School of MinesSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Wiggenhauser:2022:10.3389/fpls.2022.840941,
author = {Wiggenhauser, M and Moore, RET and Wang, P and Bienert, GP and Holst, Laursen K and Blotevogel, S},
doi = {10.3389/fpls.2022.840941},
journal = {Frontiers in Plant Science},
title = {Stable isotope fractionation of metals and metalloids in plants: a review},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.840941},
volume = {13},
year = {2022}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - This work critically reviews stable isotope fractionation of essential (B, Mg, K, Ca, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo), beneficial (Si), and non-essential (Cd, Tl) metals and metalloids in plants. The review (i) provides basic principles and methodologies for non-traditional isotope analyses, (ii) compiles isotope fractionation for uptake and translocation for each element and connects them to physiological processes, and (iii) interlinks knowledge from different elements to identify common and contrasting drivers of isotope fractionation. Different biological and physico-chemical processes drive isotope fractionation in plants. During uptake, Ca and Mg fractionate through root apoplast adsorption, Si through diffusion during membrane passage, Fe and Cu through reduction prior to membrane transport in strategy I plants, and Zn, Cu, and Cd through membrane transport. During translocation and utilization, isotopes fractionate through precipitation into insoluble forms, such as phytoliths (Si) or oxalate (Ca), structural binding to cell walls (Ca), and membrane transport and binding to soluble organic ligands (Zn, Cd). These processes can lead to similar (Cu, Fe) and opposing (Ca vs. Mg, Zn vs. Cd) isotope fractionation patterns of chemically similar elements in plants. Isotope fractionation in plants is influenced by biotic factors, such as phenological stages and plant genetics, as well as abiotic factors. Different nutrient supply induced shifts in isotope fractionation patterns for Mg, Cu, and Zn, suggesting that isotope process tracing can be used as a tool to detect and quantify different uptake pathways in response to abiotic stresses. However, the interpretation of isotope fractionation in plants is challenging because many isotope fractionation factors associated with specific processes are unknown and experiments are often exploratory. To overcome these limitations, fundamental geochemical research should expand the database of isotope fractionation factors and disentangl
AU - Wiggenhauser,M
AU - Moore,RET
AU - Wang,P
AU - Bienert,GP
AU - Holst,Laursen K
AU - Blotevogel,S
DO - 10.3389/fpls.2022.840941
PY - 2022///
SN - 1664-462X
TI - Stable isotope fractionation of metals and metalloids in plants: a review
T2 - Frontiers in Plant Science
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.840941
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/96488
VL - 13
ER -