Imperial College London

DrRobertVerity

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 3946r.verity Website

 
 
//

Location

 

UG12Praed StreetSt Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Knock:2021:10.1126/scitranslmed.abg4262,
author = {Knock, ES and Whittles, LK and Lees, JA and Perez-Guzman, PN and Verity, R and FitzJohn, RG and Gaythorpe, KAM and Imai, N and Hinsley, W and Okell, LC and Rosello, A and Kantas, N and Walters, CE and Bhatia, S and Watson, OJ and Whittaker, C and Cattarino, L and Boonyasiri, A and Djaafara, BA and Fraser, K and Fu, H and Wang, H and Xi, X and Donnelly, CA and Jauneikaite, E and Laydon, DJ and White, PJ and Ghani, AC and Ferguson, NM and Cori, A and Baguelin, M},
doi = {10.1126/scitranslmed.abg4262},
journal = {Science Translational Medicine},
pages = {1--12},
title = {Key epidemiological drivers and impact of interventions in the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abg4262},
volume = {13},
year = {2021}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - We fitted a model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in care homes and the community to regional surveillance data for England. Compared with other approaches, our model provides a synthesis of multiple surveillance data streams into a single coherent modelling framework allowing transmission and severity to be disentangled from features of the surveillance system. Of the control measures implemented, only national lockdown brought the reproduction number (Rteff ) below 1 consistently; if introduced one week earlier it could have reduced deaths in the first wave from an estimated 48,600 to 25,600 (95% credible interval [95%CrI]: 15,900-38,400). The infection fatality ratio decreased from 1.00% (95%CrI: 0.85%-1.21%) to 0.79% (95%CrI: 0.63%-0.99%), suggesting improved clinical care. The infection fatality ratio was higher in the elderly residing in care homes (23.3%, 95%CrI: 14.7%-35.2%) than those residing in the community (7.9%, 95%CrI: 5.9%-10.3%). On 2nd December 2020 England was still far from herd immunity, with regional cumulative infection incidence between 7.6% (95%CrI: 5.4%-10.2%) and 22.3% (95%CrI: 19.4%-25.4%) of the population. Therefore, any vaccination campaign will need to achieve high coverage and a high degree of protection in vaccinated individuals to allow non-pharmaceutical interventions to be lifted without a resurgence of transmission.
AU - Knock,ES
AU - Whittles,LK
AU - Lees,JA
AU - Perez-Guzman,PN
AU - Verity,R
AU - FitzJohn,RG
AU - Gaythorpe,KAM
AU - Imai,N
AU - Hinsley,W
AU - Okell,LC
AU - Rosello,A
AU - Kantas,N
AU - Walters,CE
AU - Bhatia,S
AU - Watson,OJ
AU - Whittaker,C
AU - Cattarino,L
AU - Boonyasiri,A
AU - Djaafara,BA
AU - Fraser,K
AU - Fu,H
AU - Wang,H
AU - Xi,X
AU - Donnelly,CA
AU - Jauneikaite,E
AU - Laydon,DJ
AU - White,PJ
AU - Ghani,AC
AU - Ferguson,NM
AU - Cori,A
AU - Baguelin,M
DO - 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg4262
EP - 12
PY - 2021///
SN - 1946-6234
SP - 1
TI - Key epidemiological drivers and impact of interventions in the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England
T2 - Science Translational Medicine
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abg4262
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158411
UR - https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/13/602/eabg4262
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90018
VL - 13
ER -