Imperial College London

Professor Sir Roy Anderson FRS, FMedSci

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Professor in Infectious Disease Epidemiology
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

roy.anderson Website

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Mrs Clare Mylchreest +44 (0)7766 331 301

 
//

Location

 

LG35Norfolk PlaceSt Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Coffeng:2019:infdis/jiz535,
author = {Coffeng, L and Malizia, V and Vegvari, C and Cools, P and Halliday, KE and Levecke, B and Mekonnen, Z and Gichuki, PM and Sayasone, S and Sarkar, R and Shaali, A and Vlaminck, J and Anderson, RM and de, Vlas SJ},
doi = {infdis/jiz535},
journal = {Journal of Infectious Diseases},
pages = {S531--S538},
title = {Impact of different sampling schemes for decision making in soil-transmitted helminthiasis control programs},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz535},
volume = {221},
year = {2019}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Starting and stopping preventive chemotherapy (PC) for soil-transmitted helminthiasis is typically based on the prevalence of infection as measured by Kato-Katz (KK) fecal smears. Kato-Katz-based egg counts can vary highly over repeated stool samples and smears. Consequentially, the sensitivity of KK-based surveys depends on the number of stool samples per person and the number of smears per sample. Given finite resources, collecting multiple samples and/or smears means screening fewer individuals, thereby lowering the statistical precision of prevalence estimates. Using population-level data from various epidemiological settings, we assessed the performance of different sampling schemes executed within the confines of the same budget. We recommend the use of single-slide KK for determining prevalence of moderate-to-heavy intensity infection and policy decisions for starting and continuing PC; more sensitive sampling schemes may be required for policy decisions involving stopping PC. Our findings highlight that guidelines should include specific guidance on sampling schemes.
AU - Coffeng,L
AU - Malizia,V
AU - Vegvari,C
AU - Cools,P
AU - Halliday,KE
AU - Levecke,B
AU - Mekonnen,Z
AU - Gichuki,PM
AU - Sayasone,S
AU - Sarkar,R
AU - Shaali,A
AU - Vlaminck,J
AU - Anderson,RM
AU - de,Vlas SJ
DO - infdis/jiz535
EP - 538
PY - 2019///
SN - 0022-1899
SP - 531
TI - Impact of different sampling schemes for decision making in soil-transmitted helminthiasis control programs
T2 - Journal of Infectious Diseases
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz535
UR - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000544191700006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
UR - https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/221/Supplement_5/S531/5673766
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/82105
VL - 221
ER -