Imperial College London

Professor Tom Bourne

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction

Chair in Gynaecology
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 3313 5131t.bourne Website

 
 
//

Location

 

Early pregnancy and acute gynaecologyInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental BiologyHammersmith Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Harb:2018:10.1111/1471-0528.15255,
author = {Harb, HM and Knight, M and Bottomley, C and Overton, C and Tobias, A and Gallos, ID and Shehmar, M and Farquharson, R and Horne, A and Latthe, P and Edi-Osagie, E and MacLean, M and Marston, E and Zamora, J and Dawood, F and Small, R and Ross, J and Bourne, T and Coomarasamy, A and Jurkovic, D},
doi = {10.1111/1471-0528.15255},
journal = {BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology},
pages = {1663--1670},
title = {Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15255},
volume = {125},
year = {2018}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to describe the management outcomes associated with this condition DESIGN: A national cohort study using the UK Early Pregnancy Surveillance Service (UKEPSS). SETTING: 86 participating Early Pregnancy Units. POPULATION: All women diagnosed in the participating units with CSP between November 2013 and January 2015. METHODS: COHORT STUDY OF WOMEN IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE UKEPSS MONTHLY MAILING SYSTEM: MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, clinical outcomes and complications. RESULTS: 102 cases of CSP were reported, with an estimated incidence of 1.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 1.1 - 1.9) maternities. Full outcome data were available for 92 women. Management was expectant in 21/92 (23%), medical in 15/92 (16%), and surgical in 56/92 (61%). The success rates of expectant, medical, and surgical management were 43% (9/21), 46% (7/15) and 96% (54/56) respectively. The complication rates were 15/21 (71%) with expectant, 9/15 (60%) with medical and 20/56 (36%) with surgical management. Discharge from care (median number of days) was 82 (range 37-174) with expectant, 21 (range 10-31) with medical, and 11 (range 4-49) with surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management appears to be associated with a high success rate, low complication rate and short post-treatment follow up. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
AU - Harb,HM
AU - Knight,M
AU - Bottomley,C
AU - Overton,C
AU - Tobias,A
AU - Gallos,ID
AU - Shehmar,M
AU - Farquharson,R
AU - Horne,A
AU - Latthe,P
AU - Edi-Osagie,E
AU - MacLean,M
AU - Marston,E
AU - Zamora,J
AU - Dawood,F
AU - Small,R
AU - Ross,J
AU - Bourne,T
AU - Coomarasamy,A
AU - Jurkovic,D
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.15255
EP - 1670
PY - 2018///
SN - 1470-0328
SP - 1663
TI - Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study.
T2 - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15255
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29697890
UR - https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.15255
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/59815
VL - 125
ER -