BibTex format

author = {Patel, VM and Panzarasa, P and Ashrafian, H and Evans, TS and Kirresh, A and Sevdalis, N and Darzi, A and Athanasiou, T},
doi = {10.1177/0141076819851666},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine},
pages = {245--257},
title = {Collaborative patterns, authorship practices and scientific success in biomedical research: a network analysis.},
url = {},
volume = {112},
year = {2019}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between biomedical researchers' collaborative and authorship practices and scientific success. DESIGN: Longitudinal quantitative analysis of individual researchers' careers over a nine-year period. SETTING: A leading biomedical research institution in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and twenty-five biomedical researchers who were in employment on 31 December 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We constructed the co-authorship network in which nodes are the researchers, and links are established between any two researchers if they co-authored one or more articles. For each researcher, we recorded the position held in the co-authorship network and in the bylines of all articles published in each three-year interval and calculated the number of citations these articles accrued until January 2013. We estimated maximum likelihood negative binomial panel regression models. RESULTS: Our analysis suggests that collaboration sustained success, yet excessive co-authorship did not. Last positions in non-alphabetised bylines were beneficial for higher academic ranks but not for junior ones. A professor could witness a 20.57% increase in the expected citation count if last-listed non-alphabetically in one additional publication; yet, a lecturer suffered from a 13.04% reduction. First positions in alphabetised bylines were positively associated with performance for junior academics only. A lecturer could experience a 8.78% increase in the expected citation count if first-listed alphabetically in one additional publication. While junior researchers amplified success when brokering among otherwise disconnected collaborators, senior researchers prospered from socially cohesive networks, rich in third-party relationships. CONCLUSIONS: These results help biomedical scientists shape successful careers and research institutions develop effective assessment and recruitment policies that will ultimately sustain the quality of biomedical r
AU - Patel,VM
AU - Panzarasa,P
AU - Ashrafian,H
AU - Evans,TS
AU - Kirresh,A
AU - Sevdalis,N
AU - Darzi,A
AU - Athanasiou,T
DO - 10.1177/0141076819851666
EP - 257
PY - 2019///
SN - 1758-1095
SP - 245
TI - Collaborative patterns, authorship practices and scientific success in biomedical research: a network analysis.
T2 - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
UR -
UR -
UR -
UR -
VL - 112
ER -

Note to staff:  Adding new publications to a research group

  1. Log in to Symplectic.
  2. Click on Menu > Create Links
  3. Choose what you want to create links between – in this case ‘Publications’ and ‘Organisational structures’.
  4. Choose the organisational structure (research group) into which you want to link the publications and check the box next to it.
  5. Now check the box of any publication you want to add to that group. You can use the filters to find what you want and select multiple publications if necessary. 
  6. Scroll to the bottom and click the blue ‘Create new link’ button to link them.
  7. The publications will be added to the group, and will be displayed on the group publications feed within 24 hours (it is not immediate).

Any problems, talk to Tim Evans or the Faculty Web Team.