Publications
467 results found
Hinsley A, Hu S, Chen H, et al., 2021, Combining data from consumers and traditional medicine practitioners to provide a more complete picture of Chinese bear bile markets, PEOPLE AND NATURE, Vol: 3, Pages: 1064-1077
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
Arias M, Hinsley A, Milner-Gulland EJ, 2021, Use of evidence for decision-making by conservation practitioners in the illegal wildlife trade, PEOPLE AND NATURE, Vol: 3, Pages: 1110-1126
Khanyari M, Suryawanshi KR, Milner-Gulland EJ, et al., 2021, Predicting Parasite Dynamics in Mixed-Use Trans-Himalayan Pastures to Underpin Management of Cross-Transmission Between Livestock and Bharal, FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, Vol: 8
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 3
Maron M, Juffe-Bignoli D, Krueger L, et al., 2021, Setting robust biodiversity goals, CONSERVATION LETTERS, Vol: 14, ISSN: 1755-263X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 18
Grace MK, Bennett EL, Akcakaya HR, et al., 2021, IUCN launches Green Status of Species: a new standard for species recovery, ORYX, Vol: 55, Pages: 651-652, ISSN: 0030-6053
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
Brittain S, Tugendhat H, Newing H, et al., 2021, Conservation and the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities: looking forwards, ORYX, Vol: 55, Pages: 641-642, ISSN: 0030-6053
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 2
de Lange E, Dobson ADM, Milner-Gulland EJ, et al., 2021, Combining simulation and empirical data to explore the scope for social network interventions in conservation, BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, Vol: 261, ISSN: 0006-3207
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 2
Grace MK, Kcakaya HRA, Bull JW, et al., 2021, Building robust, practicable counterfactuals and scenarios to evaluate the impact of species conservation interventions using inferential approaches, BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, Vol: 261, ISSN: 0006-3207
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
Booth H, Squires D, Yulianto I, et al., 2021, Estimating economic losses to small-scale fishers from shark conservation: A hedonic price analysis, CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, Vol: 3
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 12
Khanyari M, Robinson S, Morgan ER, et al., 2021, Building an ecologically founded disease risk prioritization framework for migratory wildlife species based on contact with livestock, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Vol: 58, Pages: 1838-1853, ISSN: 0021-8901
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Hazenbosch M, Sui S, Isua B, et al., 2021, Using locally available fertilisers to enhance the yields of swidden farmers in Papua New Guinea, AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, Vol: 192, ISSN: 0308-521X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
Doughty H, Veríssimo D, Lee JSH, et al., 2021, Evidence-Based Behaviour Change Intervention on Saiga Horn Medicine in Singapore: Research Brief
<p>Key Points: 1. A rare example of a wildlife trade initiative that covers all stages of an evidence-based behaviour change intervention. 2. Intervention development involved combining extensive consumer research with human behaviour theory and past research. 3. Intervention used a cutting-edge, powerful combination of online news coverage and targeted advertising. 4. Post-intervention, 4% of the target audience changed their behaviour (vs 1% of non-target) and the intervention message was shown as the key cause; but high-level users did not decrease significantly pre-to post-intervention.</p>
Grace MK, Timmins HL, Bennett EL, et al., 2021, Engaging End-Users to Maximise Uptake and Effectiveness of a New Species Recovery Assessment: The IUCN Green Status of Species, CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, Vol: 19, Pages: 150-160, ISSN: 0972-4923
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 2
Arias M, Hinsley A, Nogales-Ascarrunz P, et al., 2021, Prevalence and characteristics of illegal jaguar trade in north-western Bolivia, CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, Vol: 3
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Pienkowski T, Keane A, Kinyanda E, et al., 2021, The role of nature conservation and commercial farming in psychological distress among rural Ugandans
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Mental illness is a leading contributor to the global burden of disease, but there is limited understanding of how it is influenced by socio-ecological context, particularly in the global south. We asked how interactions with ecological systems influence stressors associated with psychological distress in a rural Ugandan case study. We conducted and thematically analyzed 45 semi-structured interviews with residents of Nyabyeya Parish, Masindi District. Our results suggest that poverty and food insecurity were the primary reported causes of <jats:italic>“thinking too much”</jats:italic> and related idioms of psychological distress. The expansion of commercial agriculture may have been associated with the contraction of subsistence farming, reportedly exacerbating poverty and food insecurity among poorer households but contributing incomes to wealthier ones. Furthermore, households bordering a conservation area reported that crop losses from wildlife contributed to food insecurity. However, forest resources were important safety nets for those facing poverty and food insecurity. Our study suggests how two globally prevalent land uses – commercial agriculture and nature conservation – may influence social determinants of psychological distress in our study area. Psychological distress does not necessarily imply mental disorder. Nonetheless, exploring socially-mediated interactions with ecosystems may help explain the etiology of psychological distress. Furthermore, we suggest opportunities to manage socio-ecological systems to support mental health, such as promoting equitable access and control of livelihood resources. We also highlight co-benefits and trade-offs between global sustainability goals that could be managed for mental health, and why these should be recognized in the anticipated ‘New Deal for Nature.’</jats:p><jats:sec><jats:title>H
Mair L, Bennun LA, Brooks TM, et al., 2021, A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets, NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, Vol: 5, Pages: 836-+, ISSN: 2397-334X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 32
Booth H, Arlidge WNS, Squires D, et al., 2021, Bycatch levies could reconcile trade-offs between blue growth and biodiversity conservation, NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, Vol: 5, Pages: 715-725, ISSN: 2397-334X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 13
Olmedo A, Verissimo D, Challender DWS, et al., 2021, Who eats wild meat? Profiling consumers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, PEOPLE AND NATURE, Vol: 3, Pages: 700-710
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 5
Banks-Leite C, Larrosa C, Carrasco LR, et al., 2021, The suggestion that landscapes should contain 40% of forest cover lacks evidence and is problematic, Ecology Letters, Vol: 24, Pages: 1112-1113, ISSN: 1461-023X
A recent review suggests that forest cover needs to be restored or maintained on at least 40% of land area. In the absence of empirical evidence to support this threshold, we discuss how this suggestion is unhelpful and potentially dangerous. We advocate for regionally defined thresholds to inform conservation and restoration.
Milner-Gulland EJ, 2021, The global conservation movement is divided but not diverse: reflections on 2020, ORYX, Vol: 55, Pages: 321-322, ISSN: 0030-6053
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 3
Travers H, Walsh J, Vogt S, et al., 2021, Delivering behavioural change at scale: What conservation can learn from other fields, BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, Vol: 257, ISSN: 0006-3207
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 14
Booth H, Clark M, Milner-Gulland EJ, et al., 2021, Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems, CURRENT BIOLOGY, Vol: 31, Pages: 1788-+, ISSN: 0960-9822
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 32
Oyanedel R, Gelcich S, Milner-Gulland EJ, 2021, A framework for assessing and intervening in markets driving unsustainable wildlife use
<p>Understanding how markets drive unsustainable wildlife use is key for biodiversity conservation. Yet most approaches to date look at isolated components of wildlife markets, hindering our ability to intervene effectively to improve sustainability. To better assess and intervene in wildlife markets, we propose a framework that integrates three analytical levels. The first level, “actor”, assesses the underlying motivations and mechanisms that allow or constrain how actors benefit from wildlife markets. The second level, “inter-actor”, assesses the configuration of wildlife product supply-chains and the type of competition between actors participating in wildlife markets. The third level, “market”, evaluates overarching dynamics, quantity and price determinants, and the presence and effect of illegal products flowing into markets. We showcase the utility of the framework in a data-limited small-scale fishery case study (common hake, Merluccius gayi gayi in Chile); our mixed-method analysis provided relevant, tailored management recommendations for improving sustainability. Tackling markets driving unsustainable wildlife use needs integrated approaches that bring together the diversity of factors affecting wildlife market dynamics.</p>
Doughty H, Oliver K, Verissimo D, et al., 2021, Using theory and evidence to design behaviour change interventions for reducing unsustainable wildlife consumption, PEOPLE AND NATURE, Vol: 3, Pages: 469-483
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 5
Doughty H, Milner-Gulland EJ, Lee JSH, et al., 2021, Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore, PLOS ONE, Vol: 16, ISSN: 1932-6203
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 5
Arlidge W, Firth J, Alfaro-Shigueto J, et al., 2021, Assessing information-sharing networks within small-scale fisheries and the implications for conservation interventions
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The effectiveness of biodiversity conservation interventions is often dependent on local resource users' underlying social interactions. However, it remains unclear how fine-scale differences in information shared between resource users can influence network structure and the success of behaviour-change interventions. We investigate this knowledge gap by comparing information-sharing networks in a fishing community in Peru where a trial conservation intervention is underway to reduce the incidental capture of sea turtles (<jats:italic>bycatch</jats:italic>). We show that the general network structure detailing information sharing about sea turtle bycatch differs from other fishing-related information sharing, specifically in degree assortativity (homophily) and eccentricity. This finding highlights that fine-scale differences in the information shared between resource users may influence network structure.</jats:p>
Bennett EL, Underwood FM, Milner-Gulland EJ, 2021, To Trade or Not to Trade? Using Bayesian Belief Networks to Assess How to Manage Commercial Wildlife Trade in a Complex World, FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, Vol: 9, ISSN: 2296-701X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 17
Burgass MJ, Larrosa C, Tittensor DP, et al., 2021, Three Key considerations for biodiversity conservation in multilateral agreements, CONSERVATION LETTERS, Vol: 14, ISSN: 1755-263X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Booth H, Arias M, Brittain S, et al., 2021, "Saving Lives, Protecting Livelihoods, and Safeguarding Nature": Risk-Based Wildlife Trade Policy for Sustainable Development Outcomes Post-COVID-19, FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, Vol: 9, ISSN: 2296-701X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 20
Kuiper T, Masse F, Ngwenya NA, et al., 2021, Ranger perceptions of, and engagement with, monitoring of elephant poaching, PEOPLE AND NATURE, Vol: 3, Pages: 148-161
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.