Doing it for the kids

What does childhood really look like in the 21st century? An ongoing study is taking a new approach to finding out – by hearing from children themselves.

Block text in bright colours spelling out 'hits different'

Let’s face it, we slay, and that’s on periodt. We don’t mean to flex, but we reckon our rizz ate, no cap, because we’re in our brat era, and it hits different. So don’t be salty, just prepare to be gagged, as there’s low-key so much tea to spill.

If you can follow any of that – and aura points if you can, but I guess IYKYK – you’re likely a member of Gen Z, arguably one of the most misunderstood sections of our society. Until now. Because instead of research that is done on or to youngsters, an ongoing project, the Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones (SCAMP), is working with them. And the results are revealing. The groundbreaking study is being driven by The Mohn Centre for Children’s Health and Wellbeing, established thanks to a transformational gift from Dame Marit Mohn (MSc Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology 1973). But can children really be co-creators of research? What does a project look like when you’re collaborating with a group of 16- and 17-year-olds? And what do young people themselves think of it all?

“I feel like something’s got to change in research, and it needs to be a two-way street,” says Professor Mireille Toledano, Director of the Mohn Centre and Principal Investigator of SCAMP. “People give to us in our research study, but we’ve got to give back to them. We’re collaborating together, we’re engaging with one another, and they are co-creating from the very beginning all the way through the research cycle.”

SCAMP is a cohort study that started in 2014 – beginning with simple questions to around 7,000 Year 7 students from 39 schools across Greater London. Since then, researchers have followed up with the students every two years, collecting a dizzying amount of information about their digital technology use, demographics, brain function and mental and physical health. Today, they are working with more than 11,000 young people from 55 schools, and plan to keep the study going on an indefinite basis.

“Ultimately, we’re doing this research because we want young people and parents to be able to make better-informed choices around how they use mobile phones,” says Dr Rachel Smith, Research Fellow in Population Child Health, who worked on the project alongside Dr Steven Shen, Dr Lan Cheng, Jerry Bryan, Dr Rhiannon Thompson and Nicole Curtis. “If we can get good evidence from the environment they live in now, everyone can be better informed.”

Block text in bright colours spelling out 'hits different'
Block pink background colour

Word on the street

Ate: Did something really well.

Beef: Having drama or a feud with someone.

Beggy: Someone who is too eager to gain attention, approval, or material benefits from others.

Brat: Courtesy of Charli XCX – going against the grain or doing the unexpected; a resistance to all things curated and conventional.

Flex: To brag (or flex your metaphorical muscles).

Gagged: Shocked, amazed.

Goblin mode: Unapologetically self-indulgent or lazy behaviour.

Hits different: Really good in a unique special way.

IYKYK: If you know you know (often for inside jokes).

As well as boasting the largest dataset in the world around young people’s mobile phone use, SCAMP is notable for its breadth of scope. And as the study develops, it’s possible to ask a much wider set of questions beyond mobile phone use, to ask about air pollution, noise pollution and exposure to green space.

But what makes it really special is the way it engages with its research subjects. The Mohn Centre is a transdisciplinary research centre that addresses childhood health challenges in urban environments. Here, young people are seen not just as passive study participants, but as research co-creators in their own right.

However, this isn’t always easy to accomplish – at least not in the representative way one might hope. As Toledano notes, the young people who volunteer to take part typically come from higher socioeconomic backgrounds. That leaves whole pockets of society who don’t get their voices heard in research.

It feels like something’s got to change, and it needs to be a two-way street. So instead of research that is done on or to youngsters, SCAMP is working with them

To address this, the Mohn Centre focuses heavily on community engagement. It works with a range of local organisations, with a view to breaking down the barriers to wider involvement. These include Nova New Opportunities, a charity that supports families local to White City.

“If you’ve got an issue that affects young people, it’s only through working with young people that you can understand whether what you’re doing is relevant,” says Matthew Barnett, head of Nova’s Family Programme. “If young people aren’t fully involved in what they do, it’s very disempowering, and it doesn’t lead to the most meaningful outcomes.”

Nova has worked with the Mohn Centre on various initiatives, not least a series of short films in which young people documented their views about the urban environment. “This was a good way of seeing the area through the eyes of the children who live there,” says Barnett. “The subjects the young people talked about were very similar to the issues we’re hearing day to day. They were very concerned about litter or the lack of greenery, or things looking dirty or broken.”

They also voiced concerns about phone addiction and the online environment. More often than not, they are critical of excessive phone use. “We might expect young people would be very defensive of their smartphones. But in the consultations we have held, that isn’t really the case,” he says.

As the SCAMP study progresses, we can expect to see more consensus around these themes. Already, the study has returned several important findings, including that social media use is associated with increased behavioural problems and lower health-related quality of life, but the latter only in girls. Another is that screentime before bed may put adolescents at risk of poor sleep.

“The nuance here is if people are using phones or watching TV in a room with a light on, they’re more likely to get insufficient sleep, but the risk increases massively if they’re doing that activity in the dark,” says Smith.

There are many more research angles remaining to be probed. Mia Ward and David Fierros are A-level students at Chislehurst & Sidcup Grammar School in south-east London. Together with six of their peers, they took part in the SCAMP Research Challenge – a new wave of the SCAMP study that enables students to lead the research effort in their schools. They were trained to design projects, develop research questions, and collect and analyse data.

We might expect young people would be defensive of their smartphones, but that really isn’t the case

“We came up with a research question to study, then we set out to apply that and collected biometric data from other people in our school,” says Ward. “In our case, we decided to look at how the internet and social media affect people’s emotional abilities and eating habits.”

The data collection procedure was rigorous – “we collected urine samples, for the greater good,” laughs Fierros – and Ward says that keeping everyone organised was a lot to handle. But while remaining honest about the challenges, both students wax lyrical about the benefits. “I’d definitely recommend it, especially to anyone planning on studying psychology or biology at university,” says Ward. “It’s really interesting to take part in research that could go on to be published, especially because our findings may affect us directly.”

SCAMP researchers, including Thompson and Curtis, are now working with a new set of student teams to co-design an intervention for young people’s mental health. The research questions are directly based on the students’ experiences – an exciting and innovative feature – and there’s a mutual benefit to the arrangement, in that the students have something valuable to add to their CVs.

“Especially since COVID, schools have got a lot going on, and teachers are very busy,” says Smith. “We try to have a reciprocal approach – at a basic level that might be compensating people for their time in the form of a voucher, but we might also give young people experiences that can enhance their skills and careers.”

Block text in bright colours spelling out 'ate' and 'flex'
Block pink background colour

Word on the street (continued)

Low-key: Used casually to play down emotions or opinions (“I’m low-key not their biggest fan”).

No cap: No lie (sometimes used sarcastically). The opposite of cap (a lie). Periodt: Used at the end of a statement to emphasise a point.

Pushing P: Used when something is going great.

Rizz: Short for charisma, the ability to charm or attract someone.

Slay: Something impressive or someone who performed very well.

Salty: To be jealous.

Tea: Drama or gossip (telling your friends the tea is called “spilling the tea”).

Aside from SCAMP, the Mohn Centre is working on several projects investigating how policy decisions affect young people – for instance, how does the two-child benefit cap affect their mental and physical health? It has also set up a training programme, helping other Imperial researchers involve young people in a far more hands-on way.

“People have said to us that that’s given them the confidence to get young people directly involved in their work as advisers, which I think is really fantastic,” says Toledano.

In doing so, the Mohn Centre could make a real difference to research protocols. Few scientists have the facility to treat their young subjects as anything more than subjects. But as the SCAMP study demonstrates, truly engaging them can enrich the work and provide a wealth of new ideas and insights. It can also spark new passions among the young people themselves.

“Social media affects our age group and younger the most,” says Ward, “we’re the ones who are most frequently on social media and the people who are developing new social media. A lot of the existing research was designed by adults, which really biases studies. But nobody understands what teenagers deal with better than teenagers.”

Block text in bright colours spelling out 'gagged' and 'salty'

Imperial is the magazine for the Imperial community. It delivers expert comment, insight and context from – and on – Imperial's engineers, mathematicians, scientists, medics, coders and leaders, as well as stories about student life and alumni experiences.

This story was published originally in Imperial 58/Summer 2025.