Imperial College London

Dr Ana Luisa Neves

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Clinical Senior Lecturer in Digital Health
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

ana.luisa.neves14

 
 
//

Location

 

Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing (QEQM)St Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Neves:2021:10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120,
author = {Neves, AL and Li, E and Gupta, PP and Fontana, G and Darzi, A},
doi = {10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120},
journal = {European Journal of General Practice},
pages = {241--247},
title = {Virtual primary care in high-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: policy responses and lessons for the future},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120},
volume = {27},
year = {2021}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Background: Telemedicine, once defined merely as the treatment of certain conditions remotely, has now often been supplanted in use by broader terms such as ‘virtual care’, in recognition of its increasing capability to deliver a diverse range of healthcare services from afar. With the unexpected onset of COVID-19, virtual care (e.g., telephone, video, online) has become essential to facilitating the continuation of primary care globally. Over several short weeks, existing healthcare policies have adapted quickly and empowered clinicians to use digital means to fulfil a wide range of clinical responsibilities which until then, have required face-to-face consultations. Objective: This paper aims to explore the virtual care policies and guidance material published during the initial months of the pandemic and examine their potential limitations and impact on transforming the delivery of primary care in high-income countries. Methods: A rapid review of publicly available national policies guiding the use of virtual care in General Practice was conducted. Documents were included if issued in the first six months of the pandemic (March to August of 2020) and focused primarily on high-income countries. Documents must have been issued by a national health authority, accreditation body, or professional organisation, and directly refer to the delivery of primary care. Results: We extracted six areas of relevance: primary care transformation during COVID-19, the continued delivery of preventative care, the delivery of acute care, remote triaging, funding & reimbursement, and security standards.Conclusion: Virtual care use in primary care saw a transformative change during the pandemic. However, despite the advances in the various governmental guidance offered, much work remains in addressing the shortcomings exposed during COVID-19 and strengthening viable policies so as to better incorporate novel technologies into the modern primary care clinical
AU - Neves,AL
AU - Li,E
AU - Gupta,PP
AU - Fontana,G
AU - Darzi,A
DO - 10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120
EP - 247
PY - 2021///
SN - 1381-4788
SP - 241
TI - Virtual primary care in high-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: policy responses and lessons for the future
T2 - European Journal of General Practice
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/91022
VL - 27
ER -