Imperial College London
Alternate

DrHutanAshrafian

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer

Honorary Senior Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 3312 7651h.ashrafian

 
 
//

Location

 

1089Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing (QEQM)St Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Ravindran:2024:10.1055/a-2177-4130,
author = {Ravindran, S and Matharoo, M and Rutter, MD and Ashrafian, H and Darzi, A and Healey, C and Thomas-Gibson, S},
doi = {10.1055/a-2177-4130},
journal = {Endoscopy},
pages = {89--99},
title = {Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS).},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2177-4130},
volume = {56},
year = {2024}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BACKGROUND: Despite advances in understanding and reducing the risk of endoscopic procedures, there is little consideration of the safety of the wider endoscopy service. Patient safety incidents (PSIs) still occur. We sought to identify nonprocedural PSIs (nPSIs) and their causative factors from a human factors perspective and generate ideas for safety improvement. METHODS: Endoscopy-specific PSI reports were extracted from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). A retrospective, cross-sectional human factors analysis of data was performed. Two independent researchers coded data using a hybrid thematic analysis approach. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was used to code contributory factors. Analysis informed creation of driver diagrams and key recommendations for safety improvement in endoscopy. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2019, 1181 endoscopy-specific PSIs of significant harm were reported across England and Wales, with 539 (45.6%) being nPSIs. Five categories accounted for over 80% of all incidents, with "follow-up and surveillance" being the largest (23.4% of all nPSIs). From the free-text incident reports, 487 human factors codes were identified. Decision-based errors were the most common act prior to PSI occurrence. Other frequent preconditions to incidents were focused on environmental factors, particularly overwhelmed resources, patient factors, and ineffective team communication. Lack of staffing, standard operating procedures, effective systems, and clinical pathways were also contributory. Seven key recommendations for improving safety have been made in response to our findings. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first national-level human factors analysis of endoscopy-specific PSIs. This work will inform safety improvement strategies and should empower individual services to review their approach to safety.
AU  - Ravindran,S
AU  - Matharoo,M
AU  - Rutter,MD
AU  - Ashrafian,H
AU  - Darzi,A
AU  - Healey,C
AU  - Thomas-Gibson,S
DO  - 10.1055/a-2177-4130
EP  - 99
PY  - 2024///
SP  - 89
TI  - Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS).
T2  - Endoscopy
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2177-4130
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37722604
VL  - 56
ER  -
Download