Imperial College London

Professor Mohamad Hamady

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & Cancer

Professor of Practice (Interventional Radiology)
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 3312 2282 1m.hamady

 
 
//

Location

 

Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing (QEQM)St Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Hamady:2021:10.1186/s42155-021-00268-w,
author = {Hamady, M and Tsitsiou, Y and Ekpe, J and Harris, L and Kashef, E},
doi = {10.1186/s42155-021-00268-w},
journal = {CVIR Endovascular},
pages = {1--8},
title = {Use and effectiveness of Pioneer Re-entry device for subintimal true lumen re-entry: single-centre data and a review of the literature.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-021-00268-w},
volume = {4},
year = {2021}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - IntroductionDuring subintimal angioplasty (SIA), it is not always possible to re-enter the vessel lumen due to a variety of factors. Recanalization using hydrophilic wires and catheters alone, apart from its potential technical failure, is also limited by minimal control over the re-entry point. This is frequently well beyond the point of occlusion, thus often compromising important collaterals. In order to bypass the obstruction and attain controlled re-entry into the lumen of the diseased vessel, a re-entry device (RED) may be required. This paper assesses our centre’s experience with the safety and efficacy of the Pioneer re-entry system and systematically reviews the pertinent literature.MethodA single centre retrospective study of subintimal angioplasty involving the use of the Pioneer Plus intravascular guided reentry catheter was performed. Patient demographics including age, gender, risk factors, comorbidities clinical indication and complications were recorded. Lesion characteristics, including location and severity of calcification were also assessed.A systematic literature review of all reported studies where the Pioneer RED was used for iliac and lower limb revascularization was conducted by 2 of the authors using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases.ResultsThe study comprised 30 cases. Technical success was 97%. A small, quickly resolved extravasation was the only device related complication. These results are in line with the systematic review which identified 16 studies using the Pioneer RED, reporting a technical success rate of 87.4–100% (median = 100%) and complication rate of 0–25.8% (median = 0%). However, due to heterogeneity in definitions of technical success, data was not pooled.
AU - Hamady,M
AU - Tsitsiou,Y
AU - Ekpe,J
AU - Harris,L
AU - Kashef,E
DO - 10.1186/s42155-021-00268-w
EP - 8
PY - 2021///
SN - 2520-8934
SP - 1
TI - Use and effectiveness of Pioneer Re-entry device for subintimal true lumen re-entry: single-centre data and a review of the literature.
T2 - CVIR Endovascular
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-021-00268-w
UR - https://cvirendovasc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42155-021-00268-w
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/93159
VL - 4
ER -