Imperial College London

DrRichardHanna

Faculty of Natural SciencesCentre for Environmental Policy

Research Associate
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 9248r.hanna

 
 
//

Location

 

16 Prince's GardensSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Hoseinpoori:2023:10.1016/j.esr.2023.101142,
author = {Hoseinpoori, P and Hanna, R and Woods, J and Markides, C and Shah, N},
doi = {10.1016/j.esr.2023.101142},
journal = {Energy Strategy Reviews},
pages = {1--25},
title = {Comparing alternative pathways for the future role of the gas grid in a low-carbon heating system},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101142},
volume = {49},
year = {2023}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - This paper uses a whole-system approach to examine different strategies related to the future role of the gas grid in alow-carbon heat system. A novel model of integrated gas, electricity and heat systems, HEGIT, is used to investigate fourkey sets of scenarios for the future of the gas grid using the UK as a case study: a) complete electrification of heating; b)conversion of the existing gas grid to deliver hydrogen; c) a hybrid heat pump system; and d) a greener gas grid. Ourresults indicate that although the infrastructure requirements, the fuel or resource mix, and the breakdown of costs varysignificantly over the complete electrification to complete conversion of the gas grid to hydrogen spectrum, the total systemtransition cost is relatively similar. This reduces the significance of total system cost as a guiding factor in policy decisionson the future of the gas grid. Furthermore, we show that determining the roles of low-carbon gases and electrification fordecarbonising heating is better guided by the trade-offs between short- and long-term energy security risks in the system,as well as trade-offs between consumer investment in fuel switching and infrastructure requirements for decarbonisingheating. Our analysis of these trade-offs indicates that although electrification of heating using heat pumps is not thecheapest option to decarbonise heat, it has clear co-benefits as it reduces fuel security risks and dependency on carboncapture and storage infrastructure. Combining different strategies, such as grid integration of heat pumps with increasedthermal storage capacity and installing hybrid heat pumps with gas boilers on the consumer side, are demonstrated toeffectively moderate the infrastructure requirements, consumer costs and reliability risks of widespread electrification.Further reducing demand on the electricity grid can be accomplished by complementary options at the system level, suchas partial carbon offsetting using negative emission technologies
AU - Hoseinpoori,P
AU - Hanna,R
AU - Woods,J
AU - Markides,C
AU - Shah,N
DO - 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101142
EP - 25
PY - 2023///
SN - 2211-467X
SP - 1
TI - Comparing alternative pathways for the future role of the gas grid in a low-carbon heating system
T2 - Energy Strategy Reviews
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101142
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X23000925
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/105521
VL - 49
ER -