Page 46 - EDU_Programme_Handbook_2015
P. 46
PG CERT ULT
should present the design or re-design of a unit of more educationally effective, but feasible,
learning in the student’s own teaching context and approaches to assessment.
state the educational rationale for the decisions
and approaches taken, supported with reference to Teaching Methods
educational literature.
Pre-seminar reading of 2-3 papers will be made This topic is taught through an initial face-to-face
available two weeks before the seminar. In advance, seminar. In advance students should identify an
students should also consider a unit of learning (e.g. assessment activity that they are involved in (as
series of teaching sessions, module) that they may designer, teacher, marker and/or feedback giver)
wish to design or re-design and bring documentation and bring documentation to the session (e.g. related
(e.g. module outline, session plans). ILOs, assessment brief, marking criteria etc.). They
will discuss the pros and cons of this assessment
Further suggested reading will also be provided in the tool/documentation with the group. These learning
seminar. activities, in combination with directed reading and
self-study should prepare students to complete a
ECTS credits: 5 written assignment on the design or re-design of a
UKPSF indicative mapping: A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, K1, K2, future assessment for their students. This will be
K3, K4, K5, V1, V3, V4, V5. submitted for formative assessment and feedback.
Word Count: 1500-2000
Tutor: Mrs. Kate Ippolito
Assessment and Intended Learning Outcomes:
Feedback
By the end of the topic students will be better able to:
Aims 1. Explain the difference between summative
and formative assessment and discuss their
Assessment and feedback are fundamental, yet purpose in the curriculum.
often under-examined, elements of the university
learning experience. They present a high risk activity 2. Apply key assessment principles to make
for both students and their teachers, and, as such, assessment fair and more effective for
can provoke student dissatisfaction and reluctance learning.
towards innovation amongst teachers.
3. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
This topic provides students with opportunity to: group, peer or self-assessment.
• discuss challenges and possibilities in 4. Consider student perceptions and
student assessment; experiences of assessment and feedback.
• develop a deeper understanding to inform 5. Reflect critically on their existing assessment
the practical development of fair and and feedback approaches and how they
impact on student learning.
44 EDU © Imperial College London 2015-16

