Page 63 - EDU_Programme_Handbook
P. 63
k Sheet for Postgraduate Diploma
Library Project – Reading & Writing
Participant CID:
Title of work:
Marker’s Name:
Instructions
1. Please read the grade guidelines and enter comments under the headings below.
2. Then reach an overall judgement about the quality of the work, using the grade criteria for the programme and learning
outcomes for the module to guide your judgement. 50% or more represents a pass mark.
3. Please tick one box below to indicate the grade that corresponds best to your overall judgement and indicate the
percentage score.
Please tick Grade: Ungraded Grade D (fail) Grade C Grade B Grade A
appropriate 39% or less 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-100%
box
Please give % mark
Comments
1.) Integration and Application
a) Demonstrates an ability to read and integrate different types of literature and to apply these to an area of their own practice.
2.) Critical Use of Literature
a) Identifies different viewpoints in the literature and explains how they might relate to one another.
b) Is able to engage critically with the literature by identifying strengths and weaknesses within the arguments and claims of the
literature. For example, by considering the warrant, the context, the application or the method used in the literature.
3.) Reflection Insight and Evaluation
a) In the context of the reading, demonstrates reflection and critical evaluation of own and others’ teaching practices.
4.) Understanding and Relevance
a) Demonstrates an understanding of relevant knowledge, concepts, theories, issues, policy, ideas and their applications to
practice (students should refer to two or more of these components as appropriate to their assignment).
b) Demonstrates an ability to make relevant connections between the knowledge, concepts, theories, issues, policy, ideas and
their applications to practice, which make up the content of the assignment.
5.) Reasoning Structure and Argument
a) The writing is structured in a way which demonstrates a narrative and/or has a clear rationale.
b) Presents arguments that are developed and defended through the use of theory, practice or empirical evidence (students
should refer to two or more of these components as appropriate to their assignment).
6.) Independence
a) Is able to generate recommendations, which may show creativity and innovation. This might be demonstrated in a number of
different ways, but there is no requirement here to show originality.
7.) Academic Structure and Presentation
a) There is a good standard of presentation which includes; appropriate structure, clarity of expression, use of appropriate
educational language, correct (Harvard) referencing and overall technical accuracy.
Overall Comments
Library Project – Reading & Writing
Participant CID:
Title of work:
Marker’s Name:
Instructions
1. Please read the grade guidelines and enter comments under the headings below.
2. Then reach an overall judgement about the quality of the work, using the grade criteria for the programme and learning
outcomes for the module to guide your judgement. 50% or more represents a pass mark.
3. Please tick one box below to indicate the grade that corresponds best to your overall judgement and indicate the
percentage score.
Please tick Grade: Ungraded Grade D (fail) Grade C Grade B Grade A
appropriate 39% or less 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-100%
box
Please give % mark
Comments
1.) Integration and Application
a) Demonstrates an ability to read and integrate different types of literature and to apply these to an area of their own practice.
2.) Critical Use of Literature
a) Identifies different viewpoints in the literature and explains how they might relate to one another.
b) Is able to engage critically with the literature by identifying strengths and weaknesses within the arguments and claims of the
literature. For example, by considering the warrant, the context, the application or the method used in the literature.
3.) Reflection Insight and Evaluation
a) In the context of the reading, demonstrates reflection and critical evaluation of own and others’ teaching practices.
4.) Understanding and Relevance
a) Demonstrates an understanding of relevant knowledge, concepts, theories, issues, policy, ideas and their applications to
practice (students should refer to two or more of these components as appropriate to their assignment).
b) Demonstrates an ability to make relevant connections between the knowledge, concepts, theories, issues, policy, ideas and
their applications to practice, which make up the content of the assignment.
5.) Reasoning Structure and Argument
a) The writing is structured in a way which demonstrates a narrative and/or has a clear rationale.
b) Presents arguments that are developed and defended through the use of theory, practice or empirical evidence (students
should refer to two or more of these components as appropriate to their assignment).
6.) Independence
a) Is able to generate recommendations, which may show creativity and innovation. This might be demonstrated in a number of
different ways, but there is no requirement here to show originality.
7.) Academic Structure and Presentation
a) There is a good standard of presentation which includes; appropriate structure, clarity of expression, use of appropriate
educational language, correct (Harvard) referencing and overall technical accuracy.
Overall Comments
