Page 59 - EDU_Programme_Handbook
P. 59
k Sheet for Postgraduate Diploma – Assignment Two - Writing
Participant CID:
Marker’s Name:
Title of work:
Instructions
1. Please read the grade guidelines over page and enter comments under the headings below.
2. Then reach an overall judgement about the quality of the work, using the grade criteria for the
programme and learning outcomes for the module to guide your judgement. 50% or more represents a
pass mark.
3. Please tick one box below to indicate the grade that corresponds best to your overall judgement and
indicate the percentage score.
Please tick Grade: Grade D (fail) Grade C Grade B Grade A
appropriate box Ungraded 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-100%
39% or less
Please give %
mark
Comments
1.) Understanding and Relevance
a) Demonstrates an understanding of relevant knowledge, concepts, theories, issues, policy, ideas and
their applications to practice (students should refer to two or more of these components as
appropriate to their assignment).
b) Demonstrates an ability to make relevant connections between the knowledge, concepts, theories,
issues, policy, ideas and their applications to practice, which make up the content of the assignment.
2.) Reasoning Structure and Argument
a) The writing is structured in a way which demonstrates a narrative and/or has a clear rationale.
b) Presents arguments that are developed and defended through the use of theory, practice or
empirical evidence (students should refer to two or more of these components as appropriate to their
assignment).
3.) Independence
a) Demonstrates an ability to challenge ideas from the literature and/or current practice.
b) Is able to generate recommendations, which may show creativity and innovation. This might be
demonstrated in a number of different ways, but there is no requirement here to show originality.
4.) Academic Structure and Presentation
a) There is a good standard of presentation which includes; appropriate structure, clarity of expression,
use of appropriate educational language, correct (Harvard) referencing and overall technical
accuracy.
Overall Comments
Participant CID:
Marker’s Name:
Title of work:
Instructions
1. Please read the grade guidelines over page and enter comments under the headings below.
2. Then reach an overall judgement about the quality of the work, using the grade criteria for the
programme and learning outcomes for the module to guide your judgement. 50% or more represents a
pass mark.
3. Please tick one box below to indicate the grade that corresponds best to your overall judgement and
indicate the percentage score.
Please tick Grade: Grade D (fail) Grade C Grade B Grade A
appropriate box Ungraded 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-100%
39% or less
Please give %
mark
Comments
1.) Understanding and Relevance
a) Demonstrates an understanding of relevant knowledge, concepts, theories, issues, policy, ideas and
their applications to practice (students should refer to two or more of these components as
appropriate to their assignment).
b) Demonstrates an ability to make relevant connections between the knowledge, concepts, theories,
issues, policy, ideas and their applications to practice, which make up the content of the assignment.
2.) Reasoning Structure and Argument
a) The writing is structured in a way which demonstrates a narrative and/or has a clear rationale.
b) Presents arguments that are developed and defended through the use of theory, practice or
empirical evidence (students should refer to two or more of these components as appropriate to their
assignment).
3.) Independence
a) Demonstrates an ability to challenge ideas from the literature and/or current practice.
b) Is able to generate recommendations, which may show creativity and innovation. This might be
demonstrated in a number of different ways, but there is no requirement here to show originality.
4.) Academic Structure and Presentation
a) There is a good standard of presentation which includes; appropriate structure, clarity of expression,
use of appropriate educational language, correct (Harvard) referencing and overall technical
accuracy.
Overall Comments
