Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

DrGemmaClunie

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer

Honorary Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

g.clunie Website

 
 
//

Location

 

202Sir Michael Uren HubWhite City Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{McGregor:2022:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288,
author = {McGregor, A and Clunie, G and Hall, H and Dhuga, Y},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288},
journal = {BMJ Open},
title = {Patient and practitioner perspectives on the design of a simulated affective touch device to reduce procedural anxiety associated with radiotherapy: a qualitative study},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288},
volume = {12},
year = {2022}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - Objective The aim of this study was to elicit the views of relevant stakeholders on the design of a device using simulated affective touch to reduce procedural anxiety surrounding radiotherapy and imaging. Design This qualitative study collected data from focus groups which were then analysed using inductive thematic analysis in line with Braun and Clarke’s methods. Participants and setting Twenty patients and carers were recruited, as well as ten healthcare practitioners involved in either delivering radiotherapy or imaging procedures. Results Patients, carers and healthcare practitioners agreed on some aspects of the device design, such as ensuring the device is warm and flexible in where it can be used on the body. However, patient and healthcare practitioner cohorts had at times differing viewpoints. For example, healthcare practitioners provided professional perspectives and required easy cleaning of the device. Meanwhile patients focused on anxiety relieving factors, such as the tactile sensation of the device being either a vibration or pulsation. There was no consensus on who should control the device.  Conclusions The desired features of a simulated affective touch device have been investigated. Different priorities of patients and their carers and healthcare practitioners were evident. Any design must incorporate such features as to appease both groups. Areas where no consensus was reached could be further explored, alongside including further patient and public involvement in the form of a project advisory group.
AU  - McGregor,A
AU  - Clunie,G
AU  - Hall,H
AU  - Dhuga,Y
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288
PY  - 2022///
SN  - 2044-6055
TI  - Patient and practitioner perspectives on the design of a simulated affective touch device to reduce procedural anxiety associated with radiotherapy: a qualitative study
T2  - BMJ Open
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288
UR  - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/3/e050288.info
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/95405
VL  - 12
ER  -
Download