Publications

BibTex format

@inproceedings{Craven:2014:10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9-4,
author = {Craven, R and Toni, F and Williams, M},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9-4},
pages = {46--62},
title = {Graph-based dispute derivations in assumption-based argumentation},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9-4},
year = {2014}
}

Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Arguments in structured argumentation are usually defined as trees. This introduces both conceptual redundancy and inefficiency in standard methods of implementation. We introduce rule-minimal arguments and argument graphs to solve these problems, studying their use in assumption-based argumentation (ABA), a well-known form of structured argumentation. In particular, we define a new notion of graph-based dispute derivations for determining acceptability of claims under the grounded semantics in ABA, study formal properties and present an experimental evaluation thereof. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
AU  - Craven,R
AU  - Toni,F
AU  - Williams,M
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9-4
EP  - 62
PY  - 2014///
SN  - 0302-9743
SP  - 46
TI  - Graph-based dispute derivations in assumption-based argumentation
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9-4
ER  -

Download

DrMatthewWilliams

Contact

Location

Summary

Citation

BibTex format

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)