Page 73 - EDU_Programme_Handbook
P. 73
Dissertation Marksheet
Participant CID:
Title of work:
Marker’s Name: First / Second marker (Delete as applicable)
Instructions
1. Please read the grade guidelines and enter comments under the headings below.
2. Then reach an overall judgement about the quality of the work, using the grade criteria for the programme and
learning outcomes for the module to guide your judgement. 50% or more represents a pass mark.
3. Please tick one box below to indicate the grade that corresponds best to your overall judgement and indicate
the percentage score.
Please Tick
Appropriate Box
Grade Ungraded D (fail) C B A
39% or less 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-100%
Please Give
Percentage Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Comments
Literature – Is there an appropriate breadth and depth of literature cited (minimum 20 references)? Is this literature used
critically and appropriately to support the rationale for the work and the conclusions drawn?
Is the research question / Hypothesis clearly defined with personal &/or institutional context and position stated? Is there
a clear rationale for the work that shows appropriate knowledge and understanding?
Have appropriate methods been used to attempt to answer the research question & have they been adequately
described and supported by theory and context?
Are the data well presented and used to form appropriately reasoned and evidenced discussion with judgement &/or
conclusions as appropriate?
Are the conclusions appropriate to the methods, data and context? Is personal and/or disciplinary context and
perspective given? To what extent are the limitations and generalisability / impact discussed?
To what extent are the theory and participant’s context and practice integrated? Is there appropriate reflection on the
chosen topic? (Reflection may focus on participant’s own educational practice &/or wider institutional, disciplinary or HE
sector practice.)
Organisation and structure of the work – Is the work appropriately structured with an abstract (<500 words) and within
the word limits (10,000-20,000 words ±10%)?
Standard of presentation, clarity of expression, use of appropriate educational language, correct referencing and overall
accuracy?
Overall Comments
Participant CID:
Title of work:
Marker’s Name: First / Second marker (Delete as applicable)
Instructions
1. Please read the grade guidelines and enter comments under the headings below.
2. Then reach an overall judgement about the quality of the work, using the grade criteria for the programme and
learning outcomes for the module to guide your judgement. 50% or more represents a pass mark.
3. Please tick one box below to indicate the grade that corresponds best to your overall judgement and indicate
the percentage score.
Please Tick
Appropriate Box
Grade Ungraded D (fail) C B A
39% or less 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-100%
Please Give
Percentage Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Comments
Literature – Is there an appropriate breadth and depth of literature cited (minimum 20 references)? Is this literature used
critically and appropriately to support the rationale for the work and the conclusions drawn?
Is the research question / Hypothesis clearly defined with personal &/or institutional context and position stated? Is there
a clear rationale for the work that shows appropriate knowledge and understanding?
Have appropriate methods been used to attempt to answer the research question & have they been adequately
described and supported by theory and context?
Are the data well presented and used to form appropriately reasoned and evidenced discussion with judgement &/or
conclusions as appropriate?
Are the conclusions appropriate to the methods, data and context? Is personal and/or disciplinary context and
perspective given? To what extent are the limitations and generalisability / impact discussed?
To what extent are the theory and participant’s context and practice integrated? Is there appropriate reflection on the
chosen topic? (Reflection may focus on participant’s own educational practice &/or wider institutional, disciplinary or HE
sector practice.)
Organisation and structure of the work – Is the work appropriately structured with an abstract (<500 words) and within
the word limits (10,000-20,000 words ±10%)?
Standard of presentation, clarity of expression, use of appropriate educational language, correct referencing and overall
accuracy?
Overall Comments
