BibTex format
@article{Acharya:2024:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.239902,
author = {Acharya, B and Alexandre, J and Benes, P and Bergmann, B and Bernabéu, J and Bevan, A and Branzas, H and Burian, P and Campbell, M and Cecchini, S and Cho, YM and de, Montigny M and De, Roeck A and Ellis, JR and El, Sawy M and Fairbairn, M and Felea, D and Frank, M and Hays, J and Hirt, AM and Janecek, J and Kalliokoski, M and Korzenev, A and Lacarrère, DH and Leroy, C and Levi, G and Lionti, A and Mamuzic, J and Maulik, A and Margiotta, A and Mauri, N and Mavromatos, NE and Mermod, P and Mieskolainen, M and Millward, L and Mitsou, VA and Orava, R and Ostrovskiy, I and Ouimet, P-P and Papavassiliou, J and Parker, B and Patrizii, L and Pvla, GE and Pinfold, JL and Popa, LA and Popa, V and Pozzato, M and Pospisil, S and Rajantie, A and Ruiz, de Austri R and Sahnoun, Z and Sakellariadou, M and Santra, A and Sarkar, S and Semenoff, G and Shaa, A and Sirri, G and Sliwa, K and Soluk, R and Spurio, M and Staelens, M and Suk, M and Tenti, M and Togo, V and Tuszyski, JA and Upreti, A and Vento,},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.239902},
journal = {Physical Review Letters},
title = {Erratum: First search for dyons with the full MoEDAL trapping detector in 13 TeV collisions [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 071801 (2021)]},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.239902},
volume = {133},
year = {2024}
}
RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)
TY - JOUR
AB - The numerical calculation of the theoretically predicted cross sections in Fig. 2 in the Letter were incorrect due to a coding error. As a result, the lower limits on the dyon mass, reported in Table I in the Letter, were overestimated by ∼10–1400 GeV. This error has been corrected now, and the amended cross-section curves and mass bounds are given in Fig. 1 and Table I, respectively. The theoretical cross sections presented in Supplemental Material [1] have been corrected, too.The upper limits on the dyon production cross sections are not affected by this programming lapse. The magnetic-monopole ones have also been amended and match the originally calculated mass limits. The monopole cross-section limits are considerably stronger than their dyon counterparts, even for low electric charges. The reason is that for dyons only the negative charges are (conservatively) considered in the detection efficiency, unlike monopoles where both pair-produced particles are taken into account in the MMT acceptance calculation. The conclusions are modified quantitatively, yet the spirit remains the same, with the dyon mass bounds now ranging from 750 to 1910 GeV, continuing to be the strongest attained in collider experiments.
AU - Acharya,B
AU - Alexandre,J
AU - Benes,P
AU - Bergmann,B
AU - Bernabéu,J
AU - Bevan,A
AU - Branzas,H
AU - Burian,P
AU - Campbell,M
AU - Cecchini,S
AU - Cho,YM
AU - de,Montigny M
AU - De,Roeck A
AU - Ellis,JR
AU - El,Sawy M
AU - Fairbairn,M
AU - Felea,D
AU - Frank,M
AU - Hays,J
AU - Hirt,AM
AU - Janecek,J
AU - Kalliokoski,M
AU - Korzenev,A
AU - Lacarrère,DH
AU - Leroy,C
AU - Levi,G
AU - Lionti,A
AU - Mamuzic,J
AU - Maulik,A
AU - Margiotta,A
AU - Mauri,N
AU - Mavromatos,NE
AU - Mermod,P
AU - Mieskolainen,M
AU - Millward,L
AU - Mitsou,VA
AU - Orava,R
AU - Ostrovskiy,I
AU - Ouimet,P-P
AU - Papavassiliou,J
AU - Parker,B
AU - Patrizii,L
AU - Pvla,GE
AU - Pinfold,JL
AU - Popa,LA
AU - Popa,V
AU - Pozzato,M
AU - Pospisil,S
AU - Rajantie,A
AU - Ruiz,de Austri R
AU - Sahnoun,Z
AU - Sakellariadou,M
AU - Santra,A
AU - Sarkar,S
AU - Semenoff,G
AU - Shaa,A
AU - Sirri,G
AU - Sliwa,K
AU - Soluk,R
AU - Spurio,M
AU - Staelens,M
AU - Suk,M
AU - Tenti,M
AU - Togo,V
AU - Tuszyski,JA
AU - Upreti,A
AU - Vento,V
AU - Vives,O
AU - Wall,A
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.239902
PY - 2024///
SN - 0031-9007
TI - Erratum: First search for dyons with the full MoEDAL trapping detector in 13 TeV collisions [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 071801 (2021)]
T2 - Physical Review Letters
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.239902
UR - https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.239902
VL - 133
ER -