Citation

BibTex format

@article{Vaglio:2026:10.1103/cg1z-2r29,
author = {Vaglio, M and Falxa, M and Mentasti, G and Renzini, AI and Kuntz, A and Barausse, E and Contaldi, CR and Sesana, A},
doi = {10.1103/cg1z-2r29},
journal = {Physical Review D},
title = {Searching for gravitational waves with Gaia and its cross-correlation with PTA: Absolute vs differential astrometry},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/cg1z-2r29},
volume = {113},
year = {2026}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - <jats:p>                    Astrometric missions like Gaia provide exceptionally precise measurements of stellar positions, parallaxes, and proper motions. Gravitational waves traveling between the observer and distant stars can induce small, correlated shifts in their apparent positions, a phenomenon known as astrometric deflection. The precision and scale of astrometric datasets make them well suited for searching for a stochastic gravitational-wave background, whose signature appears in the two-point correlation function of the deflection field across the sky. In space-based astrometry, the ultimate sensitivity of such measurements is reduced by systematic uncertainties in the satellite’s absolute attitude reconstruction, which constrain the accuracy of absolute astrometry. These orientation errors can be mitigated by focusing on relative angular separation between pairs of stars, which effectively cancel out common-mode orientation noise. In this work, we compute the astrometric response and the overlap reduction functions for this differential approach, correcting previous expressions presented in the literature. We use a Fisher matrix analysis to compare the sensitivity of differential astrometry to that of conventional absolute astrometry. Our analysis shows that while the differential method is theoretically sound, its sensitivity is limited for closely spaced star pairs. Pairs with large angular separations provide competitive sensitivity, but, when considered in connection with Gaia, it is unclear whether the differential strategy would be effective, since instrumental systematics are not expected to remain correlated on such scales. Finally, we demonstrate that combining astrometric data with observations from pulsar-timing arrays leads to slight improvements in sensitivity at frequencies                    <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline">                      <a:mo></a:
AU  - Vaglio,M
AU  - Falxa,M
AU  - Mentasti,G
AU  - Renzini,AI
AU  - Kuntz,A
AU  - Barausse,E
AU  - Contaldi,CR
AU  - Sesana,A
DO  - 10.1103/cg1z-2r29
PY  - 2026///
SN  - 2470-0010
TI  - Searching for gravitational waves with Gaia and its cross-correlation with PTA: Absolute vs differential astrometry
T2  - Physical Review D
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/cg1z-2r29
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1103/cg1z-2r29
VL  - 113
ER  -
Download

Note to staff:  Adding new publications to a research group

  1. Log in to Symplectic.
  2. Click on Menu > Create Links
  3. Choose what you want to create links between – in this case ‘Publications’ and ‘Organisational structures’.
  4. Choose the organisational structure (research group) into which you want to link the publications and check the box next to it.
  5. Now check the box of any publication you want to add to that group. You can use the filters to find what you want and select multiple publications if necessary. 
  6. Scroll to the bottom and click the blue ‘Create new link’ button to link them.
  7. The publications will be added to the group, and will be displayed on the group publications feed within 24 hours (it is not immediate).

Any problems, talk to Tim Evans or the Faculty Web Team.