Areas of Research
Epigenetic regulation of myeloma
Multiple myeloma is in many ways a disease driven by inappropriate gene expression. It is characterised by the aberrant activation of gene regulatory elements known as enhancers, stimulating the upregulation of key oncogenes. Blocking this behaviour is therefore a promising strategy for myeloma treatment, and many therapeutic strategies directly or indirectly target gene regulatory pathways.
The lab studies the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, focused on the way these processes are dysregulated in multiple myeloma. We have a particular interest in understanding the role of oncogenic enhancer activity in driving myeloma-specific transcriptional profiles, and identifying the factors responsible for this behaviour. A major goal of the lab is to identify potential therapeutic targets that could be developed as novel therapies for multiple myeloma.
We use a variety of high-throughput genomics techniques to study the chromatin landscape, including ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq and RNA-seq. We have optimised TOPmentation, a small cell-number technique that allows us to characterise the chromatin profile of myeloma patient samples. In addition, we use the 3C technology Micro-Capture-C to map the physical association of enhancers and promoters. By combining these techniques with genetic and pharmacological manipulation of myeloma cell lines, we are able to explore mechanistically enhancer function and regulation.
Mechanisms of myeloma drug resistance
Relapse is very common in myeloma after initial treatment. Patients typically enter remission following treatment, but invariably relapse, often with resistance to one or more of these drugs. There is therefore a pressing need to understand the mechanisms that drive this resistance to find ways to counteract it. We are working to identify and understand epigenetic mechanisms that drive drug resistance via changes in gene expression, which therefore may be reversed to resensitise cells to therapy.
Our team
Nick Crump (he/him)
Nick Crump (he/him)
Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund Intermediate Fellow
Jinglin Zhou (he/him)
Jinglin Zhou (he/him)
PhD student
Jason Taslim (he/him)
Jason Taslim (he/him)
Research assistant
Sophie Ball (she/her)
Sophie Ball (she/her)
PhD student
Funders
Research Publications
Results
- Showing results for:
- Reset all filters
Search results
-
Journal articleLau I-J, Bloye G, Smith AL, et al., 2026,
MYB activity drives emergent enhancer activation and enhancer-promoter interactions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
, Blood, Vol: 147, Pages: 2865-2878Aberrant enhancer usage is a defining feature of oncogenic transcriptional reprogramming. Therapeutic strategies that disrupt enhancer-driven gene regulation may offer new treatment avenues. MYB is a key hematopoietic transcription factor that is frequently dysregulated in a broad range of cancers and plays a critical role in sustaining malignant cell states, including in aggressive leukemia subtypes such as KMT2A-rearranged leukemias. The molecular mechanisms by which it maintains oncogenic transcription remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigate the role of MYB in directing pathological enhancer activity to drive oncogene expression in leukemia. Using high-resolution Micro Capture-C, we show that upon MYB degradation, highly defined enhancer-promoter interactions at MYB binding sites are lost, correlating with the significant downregulation of target gene expression. When anchored to a gene desert region, the Myb transactivation domain (MybTA) is sufficient and necessary for the nucleation of an enhancer-like region. Critically, long-range chromatin interactions are established up to 400 kb away from where MybTA is anchored. This results in the activation of transcription from distal cryptic elements, which is reduced or abolished in the presence of point mutations that disrupt its interaction with the coactivators P300/CBP. All these results indicate that MYB activity alone is sufficient to generate an enhancer, inducing transcription through precise enhancer-promoter cross talk, and identify the MYB-P300/CBP axis as a therapeutically actionable vulnerability in enhancer-driven malignancies.
-
Journal articleRajhansa S, Crump NT, Khoo HM, et al., 2026,
Inhibition of MLLT1 limits growth of KMT2A::AFF1 leukaemias without killing healthy haematopoietic stem cells
, Experimental Hematology, Pages: 105458-105458, ISSN: 0301-472X -
Journal articleNg HL, Burt R, Feldhahn N, 2026,
BCR::ABL1-induced enhancer reprogramming uncovers hypersensitivity of Ph+ B-ALL cells to enhancer-targeting drugs
, Advanced Science, ISSN: 2198-3844 -
Journal articleLi Y, Wilson A, Chrisochoidou Y, et al., 2026,
EZH2 inhibition overcomes immunomodulatory drug resistance in multiple myeloma via a cereblon-dependent pathway.
, HaematologicaImmunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and the next-generation Cereblon (CRBN) E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), targeting the IKZF1/IKZF3-IRF4-MYC axis, are effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) across all stages of disease. Resistance to treatment can be acquired following exposure, but a subset of patients have primary resistance, with both states necessitating the development of alternative treatment strategies. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) has been shown to have increased expression at myeloma relapse and higher expression is associated with a shorter progression free survival from diagnosis. EZH2 inhibitors have been studied as a single agent in myeloma and in combination treatments to overcome drug resistance in other malignancies. In this study KMS-11 and RPMI-8226 myeloma cell lines are used as models of primary IMID resistance, demonstrating persistent Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) expression after IMiDs/CELMoDs exposure without loss of cell viability. The combination of Tazemetostat, an FDA-approved EZH2 inhibitor, with IMiDs/CELMoDs significantly reduces IRF4 expression, induces apoptosis, and leads to synergistic cell death in these resistant cell lines. Further investigations reveal that the synergistic effect of EZH2 inhibition appears specific to IMiDs/CELMoDs, is CRBN-dependent and rescued by IRF4 overexpression. Mechanistically, Tazemetostat appears to reduce IKZF1 binding to the IRF4 promoter and super-enhancer, explaining how the combination with IMiDs/CELMoDs which also have this effect may reach the threshold required to suppress IRF4 expression and ultimately inhibit MM cell growth in resistant cell lines. Our findings highlight a potential strategy for treating MM patients with IMiD resistance.
-
Journal articleZhou J, Crump NT, Román-Trufero M, et al., 2026,
TIME-RESOLVED MULTI-LAYERED PROFILING IDENTIFIES RESOLUTION OF RIBOSOME COLLISIONS AND TRANSLATIONAL RECOVERY AS MECHANISMS CONTRIBUTING TO PROTEASOME INHIBITOR RESISTANCE
, Haematologica, Vol: 111, Pages: 1-1, ISSN: 0390-6078Background. Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterised by a high dependence on intracellular protein homeostasis (proteostasis), a vulnerability exploited therapeutically by proteasome inhibitors (PIs) that disrupt protein degradation and induce proteotoxic stress. PIs have significantly improved clinical outcomes, but molecular mechanisms underlying adaptive resistance of MM cells to PI-induced stress remain incompletely understood. Ribosome collisions (RCs) are events that occur during compromised mRNA translation when ribosomes slow or pause, causing trailing ribosomes to physically collide. This triggers translational stress signaling aimed at resolving RCs and restoring homeostatic protein synthesis. Whether proteasome inhibition induces RCs in MM cells and whether RC resolution mechanisms contribute to adaptive PI resistance remains unknown. Methods. MM cell lines were exposed to a short pulse of carfilzomib (Cfz) to mimic clinical pharmacokinetics and followed by multi-omic analyses. RNA-seq and ribosome profiling (ribo-seq) were performed at 4h (acute stress), 24-48h (early recovery) and 6 days (late recovery) post-treatment. Global protein synthesis was assessed by puromycin incorporation, intracellular amino acid levels were quantified by targeted metabolomics (LC-MS/MS), and changes in gene and protein expression and phosphorylation were analysed by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting. Results. Cfz rapidly induced RCs, activation of the ZAKalpha-P38 initiated ribotoxic stress response (RSR), reduction of amino acids, activation of the integrated stress response (ISR) and suppression of global protein synthesis. Despite this translational repression, ribo-seq revealed selective enhancement of translation of proteasome subunits and stress-response genes in line with a “proteasome bounce-back” mechanism. During the 24h-48h period, RCs were resolved and both RSR and ISR signalling progressively decreased. Simultaneously, global protein synthesis recovered and
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.