Citation

BibTex format

@article{Whitworth,
author = {Whitworth, HS and Badhan, A and Boakye, AA and Takwoingi, Y and Rees-Roberts, M and Partlett, C and Lambie, H and Innes, J and Cooke, G and Lipman, M and Conlon, C and Macallan, D and Chua, F and Post, F and Wiselka, M and Woltmann, G and Deeks, JJ and Kon, OM and Lalvani, A and Diagnostic, Evaluation of Active TB IDEA Study Group},
journal = {Lancet Infectious Diseases},
title = {An observational cohort study to evaluate the clinical utilty of current and second-generation interferon-gamma release-assays in diagnostic evaluation of tuberculosis},
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BackgroundThe role of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) is unclear, yet they are commonly used in low-TB-incidence countries. This study sought to resolve this clinical uncertainty by determining the diagnostic accuracy and role of current and second-generation IGRAs in the diagnostic assessment of suspected TB in a low-incidence setting. MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of 1,060 adults with suspected TB, conducted in routine secondary care in England. Patients were tested for M. tuberculosis (Mtb) infection at baseline using current and second-generation IGRAs, the latter incorporating novel Mtb antigens, and followed up for 6-12m to establish definitive diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) and predictive values (PVs) of the tests for TB were determined.FindingsTB was diagnosed in 363 (43%) of 845 patients included in analyses. Sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB was 81.4% (95%CI 76.6-85.3%), higher than Quantiferon-Gold In-Tube at 67.3% (95%CI 62.0-72.1%). Second-generation IGRA had higher sensitivity than current tests, at 94.0% (95%CI 90.0–96.4%) for culture-confirmed TB and 89.2% (95%CI 85.2–92.2%) when including highly-probable TB, giving a negative LR for all TB of 0.13 (95%CI 0.10-0.19). Specificity ranged from 86.2% (95%CI 82.3-89.4%) for T-SPOT.TB to 80.0% (95%CI 75.6-83.8%) for second-generation IGRA.InterpretationCurrently-available IGRAs lack sufficient accuracy for diagnostic evaluation of suspected TB. Second-generation tests, however, may have sufficiently high sensitivity, low negative LR and correspondingly high negative PV in low-incidence settings to facilitate prompt rule-out of TB.
AU - Whitworth,HS
AU - Badhan,A
AU - Boakye,AA
AU - Takwoingi,Y
AU - Rees-Roberts,M
AU - Partlett,C
AU - Lambie,H
AU - Innes,J
AU - Cooke,G
AU - Lipman,M
AU - Conlon,C
AU - Macallan,D
AU - Chua,F
AU - Post,F
AU - Wiselka,M
AU - Woltmann,G
AU - Deeks,JJ
AU - Kon,OM
AU - Lalvani,A
AU - Diagnostic,Evaluation of Active TB IDEA Study Group
SN - 1473-3099
TI - An observational cohort study to evaluate the clinical utilty of current and second-generation interferon-gamma release-assays in diagnostic evaluation of tuberculosis
T2 - Lancet Infectious Diseases
ER -
Faculty of MedicineNational Heart and Lung Institute

General enquiries


NIHR HPRU in Respiratory Infections

Dr Victor Phillip Dahdaleh (VPD) Building
Level 5, Office 586
Imperial College London
Hammersmith Campus
Du Cane Road
London, W12 0NN

s.evetts@imperial.ac.uk