In this section
@article{Stroeks:2025:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1603,
author = {Stroeks, SLVM and Oko-Osi, S and Arasu, A and Hirst, JE and Tayal, UP},
doi = {10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1603},
journal = {JACC},
title = {Sex differences in dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence gaps and future directions},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1603},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which affects 1 in 250 people, is a leading global cause of heart failure and the most common indication for heart transplantation. Evidence suggests that DCM is more prevalent in men, but whether this reflects biological differences or underdiagnosis in women remains uncertain. This review explores the impact of sex on DCM, examining differences in epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, treatment response, and outcomes. Women often present with less severe cardiac phenotypes, including lower levels of fibrosis and better left ventricular function, yet the long-term prognosis of DCM in women is less clear. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that male DCM patients with variants in PLN, DSP, and LMNA had higher arrhythmic event rates compared with TTNtv and BAG3 carriers. In female patients with DCM, those with RBM20, DSP, and PLN variants faced the highest arrhythmic risk, and TTNtv carriers the lowest. PLN and LMNA variants had the highest heart failure risk in both sexes, whereas BAG3, RBM20, and TTN variants had lower heart failure rates in female compared with male carriers. These findings highlight the influence of sex and genotype on clinical outcomes. Current risk-stratification tools, such as those used for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, may undertreat women owing to reliance on sex-neutral thresholds. We highlight the role of genetic, environmental, and reproductive factors in shaping these disparities, including the influence of pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and menopause. This review identifies key gaps in knowledge and calls for expanded representation of women in DCM studies and the development of sex-specific risk models. Addressing these gaps is essential to improving outcomes and advancing equitable personalized care for all DCM patients.
AU - Stroeks,SLVM
AU - Oko-Osi,S
AU - Arasu,A
AU - Hirst,JE
AU - Tayal,UP
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1603
PY - 2025///
SN - 0735-1097
TI - Sex differences in dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence gaps and future directions
T2 - JACC
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1603
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1603
ER -