Annual statement on research integrity 2024

Imperial College London is committed to undertaking research of the highest international quality within an intellectually challenging and inspiring environment, to extending the frontiers of research within and beyond existing research disciplines, and to bringing together research expertise within and beyond the university to address the science challenges of today and the future.  Maintaining the highest standards of research governance and integrity are essential to the university's reputation and success.

Imperial’s reputation and success in research are underpinned both by the quality and expertise of the individuals within the university, and by the standards of research governance and integrity that the university expects all researchers to meet.  To this end, Imperial has adopted the Council for Science and Technology's Universal Ethical Code for Scientists and upholds its three principles, which are: Rigour, Honesty and Integrity; Respect for Life, the Law and the Public Good; and Responsible Communications: Listening and Informing.

Integrity is central to the Imperial’s Core Values and Behaviours, and is identified as one of the five Core Values, along with Respect, Collaboration, Excellence and Innovation, all of which are central to the way the university and its researchers carry out research.  In line with these Values, all staff are expected to be honest and open and are encouraged to check, challenge and change practices and behaviours.

Imperial’s Ethics Code also makes it clear that integrity is the guiding principle of the Code, and that every member of the university is expected to abide by the Code.  It goes on to state that those members of the university “involved in research should conduct their research responsibly and in accordance with the College’s policies and procedures relating to research ethics.”

The Vice-Provost (Research and Enterprise), Professor Mary Ryan, has leadership oversight for the research environment, including Ethics and Integrity. The Research Office’s responsibilities also include an Ethics and Integrity function. Additional information and guidance on research integrity is also made available on Imperial’s website.  This includes advice on good practice in research integrity, research governance, research misconduct, conflicts of interest, authorship, ethics approval, the use of animals in research and open access to research.  The Research Integrity pages also provide links to the Concordat to Support Research Integrity and the Universal Ethical Code for Scientists.

All university staff are required to complete Imperial Essentials training within 6 months of joining Imperial.  This comprises 6 key compliance courses, including data protection, equality, diversity and inclusion, fire safety and awareness, information security, safety training and safeguarding. Imperial also provides a variety of training opportunities and guidance for its researchers, including a Research Integrity & Ethics at Imperial College e-learning course, as well as other training programmes covering health and safety, academic supervision, intellectual property, the responsible conduct of animal research, data protection, plagiarism awareness etc.  All staff whose role involves research are required to complete the ‘Research Integrity & Ethics at Imperial’ course within their first six months of starting at the university.

In addition to these online resources and training opportunities, new fellows and clinicians are provided with a specific induction programme which includes an introduction to research integrity at Imperial. To embed a culture of ethics and integrity throughout the University the Research Governance and Integrity team also delivers training courses on research transparency, NHS research ethics and Imperial College Research ethics. 2 yearly training on ethical review has also been implemented for all university and lay members of the Imperial College Research Ethics Committees. This year the Head of the Research Governance and Integrity Team and the Trusted Research and Integrity Officer have also provided training across the College on Imperial’s updated authorship guidelines

The Postdoc and Fellows Development Centre (PFDC) has also been providing support for research staff at Imperial since 2009. The PFDC offers an extensive programme of professional skills and career development training, support, and opportunities, which enable research staff to succeed in their current position, while planning their next steps.

As well as providing training and support for research staff at the university, advice and guidance on research integrity is also provided for postgraduate research students by Imperial’s Graduate School. Its online plagiarism course is compulsory for all 1st year Doctoral students and must be completed before the 9-month Early Stage Assessment.  A similar mandatory course is also provided for Masters level students.

The Graduate School has also produced a Supervisors’ Guide, which is available online, and also as a printable handbook.  The guide sets out Imperial’s requirements for the continuing professional development of supervisors and contains information about the recruitment of research degree students, the roles and responsibilities of supervisors and Imperial's research degree milestones.  The guide is also intended to support the effective development of student supervisor partnerships, a key part of the effective development of future researchers.  

From 1 October 2024 the Graduate School and the PFDC merged to form the Early Career Researcher Institute (ECRI).  ECRI will provide a centralised hub for early career researchers and all those who support them.  The ECRI is committed to attracting, nurturing and empowering the next generation of outstanding Science, Technology, Engineering, Medicine, and Business (STEMB) research talent.

Since 2021-22, Imperial has secured over £4m from Research England's Enhancing Research Culture funding to invest in developing its research culture defined by a culture of integrity, good governance and best practice.  This funding is managed by the Vice-Provost (Research and Enterprise) Office and the Funding Strategy team (Research Office), and it has been used to support both cross-university and department-led projects. Imperial’s initial priority was to pump prime scoping projects, but as the funding has continued the focus has shifted to providing ongoing support to those projects that have shown the most potential to allow them to embed within the university. Areas for investment have included:

• Improving access to and participation in research, including postgraduate research study, for people from currently underrepresented groups;
• Furthering open research practices;
• Improving research conduct and reproducibility;
• Tackling bullying and harassment;
• Improving research leadership skills across all career stages;
• Creating routes for collaboration and exchange with businesses, third sector organisations and government;
• Securing and supporting the careers of researchers and associated professions;
• Diversifying recruitment, reward and recognition approaches at all career stages;
• Delivering new approaches to public dialogue and community-led research.

Improving research conduct, governance, ethics and reproducibility

In order to meet the Concordat’s enhanced training requirements for researchers, a new Research Integrity & Ethics at Imperial College e-learning course was created by Imperial’s Research Governance and Integrity team.  This course was made available for staff online in 2021 and all new research staff are required to complete the course within six months of joining the university.  Although aimed primarily at new staff and younger researchers, the course is available for all researchers at the University.  

In addition to Imperial’s in-house provision, the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO) has developed an online research integrity training course that is currently being piloted.  Once this has been made more widely available, Imperial will consider how this, and the other training programmes offered by UKRIO, might be able to complement the university’s own in-house training provision.

As noted above, it was agreed that the Graduate School and the PFDC should merge to form a single institute for early career researchers and those who support them, the Early Career Researcher Institute (ECRI).  The ECRI was launched on 1 October 2024 and will aim to create a collaborative and dynamic research environment that drives discovery and addresses the urgent challenges of the 21st century.  The institute will support Imperial in creating a healthy, supportive and productive research environment for early career researchers.  It will invest in research and enterprise-focused learning and development opportunities, resources and facilities to deliver an exceptional experience.  Building on the existing excellence of the Graduate School and the PFDC, a key part of the work of ECRI will be to:

• advance the higher education sector’s approach to enabling a healthy, supportive and productive research environment and the development of early career researchers.
• collaborate with experts across Imperial, as well as external partners, to deliver a world-leading environment and add value to research teams across the university.

work in partnership with wider Imperial specialist teams, to advocate for early career researchers as well as to deliver opportunities for individuals to develop the skills needed for a broad range of careers within academia and beyond.  

In March 2023 the UKRIO published its revised model procedures for the investigation of misconduct in research.  The revised procedures are designed to meet the requirements set out in the updated UK Concordat to support research integrity as well as taking account of best practice across the UK research sector. 

In the period under review Imperial completed its review of its own research misconduct procedures (which were last updated and reviewed in 2020) to take account of both the new model procedures published by UKRIO and the university’s own experiences in operating its procedures.  A key aim of these revisions is to simplify and clarify the procedures and also to make them more accessible to all university members.   

In 2024 Imperial secured £1m from Research England's Enhancing Research Culture funding to invest in developing its research culture, defined by a culture of integrity, good governance and best practice. This funding has been allocated to deliver a programme of activities aiming to improve quality and reliability, which supports a positive research culture through systemic changes to the conduct and communication of research at Imperial. Three work programmes will:

• Explore the practices and behaviours that matter in data transparency and quality in the context of team science
• Identify ways of undertaking effective public and patient involvement in the context of fundamental research and team science

Prepare a business case for Imperial to join the UK Reproducibility Network, translating Imperial’s commitment to DORA into practice.

Imperial College London has a number of policies and processes which allow staff, students and other university members to raise concerns or make complaints.  Concerns or allegations about bullying, harassment, discrimination and sexual misconduct can be reported using Imperial’s Report and Support tool.  The Report and Support tool can be used by anyone, including staff, students, contractors and visitors to the university and reports can be made by people who have witnessed an incident, or who have experienced bullying or harassment directly.  The Report and Support tool complements Imperial’s existing grievance and disciplinary procedures.

Students can raise concerns using Imperial’s Student Complaints Procedure.  Health and Safety concerns and incident reports are reported using the university’s online Safety reporting tool (SALUS). Imperial also has a ‘whistleblowing’ policy and procedure which can be used to make public interest disclosures.

All of these processes and procedures are available online together with advice and guidance on their operation.  Issues concerning research integrity or research misconduct are usually reported to the Vice-Provost (Research and Innovation), the Registrar and University Secretary or the Research Integrity Officer citing the university research misconduct procedures.  However, if concerns are raised as part of a complaint using these other tools, that aspect of the complaint will usually be referred for consideration under the research misconduct procedures.  Concerns or allegations about research misconduct may be raised by anyone in the university or by people or organisations outside Imperial.

Allegations of research misconduct are considered under the Research Misconduct Procedures (currently Annex K to the Appendix to the Ordinances). These align closely with the requirements of the Concordat and with the UK Research Integrity Office’s model procedures for the investigation of misconduct in research.  

Under these procedures, allegations of research misconduct are made in confidence to the Registrar and University Secretary, as Chair of Imperial’s Research Misconduct Response Group (RMRG) (although as noted above, in practice allegations are also often sent to the Vice-Provost (Research and Enterprise) or the Research Integrity Officer).  The other members of the RMRG are the Vice-Provost (Research and Enterprise), the Director of the Research Office and the Chief People Officer.  If the RMRG agree that an allegation meets the definition of research misconduct, it will arrange for a screening investigation to be conducted.  There are normally three possible outcomes from a screening investigation:

1. a) If there is no substance to the concerns that have been raised, the allegations will normally be dismissed;
2. b) If the screening investigation determines that there is some substance to the allegations, but it is judged that they are minor or there is a lack of intention to deceive then the allegation may be dealt with through informal resolution; or
3. c) That the allegations appear to be well-founded and there is therefore a case for further investigation. In such cases, a full investigation will then be conducted by an Investigation Panel, which must include an independent, external member. The full investigation will determine whether the allegations are proven, based on the balance of probabilities.  Where an allegation is upheld, it will usually be referred to a University Disciplinary Panel to determine the appropriate penalty to apply. The outcome of all cases that are referred for full investigation are reported to the Council and included in the annual statement on research integrity.

Imperial College recognises that research misconduct investigations are challenging; the investigation must be rigorous, but also fair to both the complainant and respondent.  Investigations of potential research misconduct are stressful for all who are involved in them, either as accuser or accused.  Imperial provides pastoral support for all those involved throughout the process, including access to support and advice as well as confidential counselling services.  Where an individual who has been accused of research misconduct is exonerated after investigation, Imperial will also take reasonable steps to help the researcher maintain their reputation and assist them in resuming any research temporarily put on hold.

Recommendations and lessons learnt from screening and full investigations may be promulgated more widely to aid good practice, even in those cases where the original allegations were dismissed or where the case was resolved informally. 

In 2024 the university investigated an allegation of a potential plagiarism in a PhD thesis.  The thesis, which was based on the further development of an experiment that had formed the basis of an earlier PhD thesis by another former member of the research group, had reused some minor elements from two figures from that earlier thesis.  The Investigating Officer determined that there was no misconduct in this case and that the reuse of these elements represented a minor copyright infringement, but did not constitute plagiarism and did not contravene the copy-paste advice given in the university’s plagiarism awareness course.  One of the recommendations arising from the investigation was that the authors of Imperial’s plagiarism awareness course should consider including advice on how PhD students can refer to a predecessors work in the same area without breaching any strong assertions of copyright in the earlier work.  Following the completion of this investigation, the complainant wrote to the university to state that the “reframing of the resolution of this issue into a potential positive structural change in plagiarism education was far beyond the scope of what [he had] hoped to accomplish”   and that he was “deeply pleased with the outcome, the response, the warm professionalism, and confidentiality of this issue. It engenders trust in the institution that is Imperial”.

In 2023-24 Imperial received sixteen allegations of potential research misconduct. This is higher than the average number of cases usually considered by the university.  Of the nine cases that were concluded in 2023-24 none were referred for full investigation.  Allegations continue to cover a range of issues, including data manipulation in published papers (including in some cases papers that were published many years previously), plagiarism in papers and sometimes in PhD theses, and authorship disputes.

Number of allegations: